Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electron‐transfer coupling in microbial fuel cells: 1. comparison of redox‐mediator reduction rates and respiratory rates of bacteria

Roller, Sibel D., Bennetto, H. Peter, Delaney, Gerard M., Mason, Jeremy R., Stirling, John L., Thurston, Christopher F.·1984·Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. Biotechnology

Abstract

Redox mediators promote electron transfer in microbial fuel cells. The reduction of a range of redox mediators by bacteria was studied in some detail in order to identify effective mediator—organism combinations. Rates of reduction of mediator dyes by bacteria were measured spectrophotometrically at 30°C under anaerobic conditions for standardised concentrations of organism, substrate and dye. The kinetics of dye reduction showed two general patterns: a simple, exponential curve or a complex curve with an initial linear rate followed by a faster exponential rate of reduction. Dye‐reduction rates were greater than rates of oxygen consumption (Q O2) for several combinations of organism and redox dye. Thionine, brilliant cresyl blue, methylene blue and benzyl viologen were tested in combination with Alcaligenes eutrophus, Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida, using glucose and succinate as substrates. Rates of reduction of alizarin brilliant blue, 2,6‐dichlorophenolindophenol, gallocyanine, new methylene blue,N,N‐dimethyl‐disulphonated thionine, phenazine ethosulphate, resorufin, safranine‐O, phenothiazinone and toluidine blue‐O were also measured with Pr. vulgaris only. For E. coli, both Q O2 and the rate of thionine reduction increased with increasing temperature in the range 25 to 37°C, but for Pr. vulgaris thionine reduction rates did not correlate with temperature in this way. Dye‐reduction rates and Q O2 for Az. chroococcum were dependent on the components of the washing solution and/or the temperature at which cell suspensions were prepared. The results are discussed in relation to the use of these dyes as electron‐transfer mediators in microbial fuel cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jctb.280340103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Roller, S. D., Bennetto, H. P., Delaney, G. M., Mason, J. R., Stirling, J. L., & Thurston, C. F.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. Biotechnology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-03
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
3-12
ISSN
  • 0264-3421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1828
OpenAlex
W2106382420
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron‐transfer coupling in microbial fuel cells: 1. comparison of redox‐mediator reduction rates and respiratory rates of bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jctb.280340103
The paper
Roller, S. D., Bennetto, H. P., Delaney, G. M., Mason, J. R., Stirling, J. L., & Thurston, C. F. (1984). Electron‐transfer coupling in microbial fuel cells: 1. comparison of redox‐mediator reduction rates and respiratory rates of bacteria. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.280340103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.