The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electron‐transfer coupling in microbial fuel cells. 2. performance of fuel cells containing selected microorganism—mediator—substrate combinations
Abstract
Various phenoxazine, phenothiazine, phenazine, indophenol and bipyridilium derivatives were tested for their effectiveness as redox mediators in microbial fuel cells containing Alcaligenes eutrophus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, or Proteus vulgaris as the active biological agent, and glucose or succinate as the oxidisable substrate. A ferricyanide‐Pt cathode was used. The open‐circuit cell e.m.f.′s increased in the order of increasing negative formal redox potentials at pH 7(E 7m) of the redox compounds. Several of the redox agents worked well as mediators, maintaining steady currents over several hours, and thionine was found to be particularly effective in maintaining relatively high cell voltages when current was drawn from the cell. A number of the compounds tested did not function well, either because they were incompletely or slowly reduced by the microorganisms or because of their instability. P. vulgaris, with thionine as mediator and glucose as substrate, showed the best performance in a fuel cell. This system was examined in some detail under various conditions of external load to establish the effects of organism concentration, mediator concentration, and substrate addition. Coulombic outputs from these cells were calculated by integration of the current‐time plots. Coulombic yields of 30–60% were obtained, on the basis of (theoretical) complete oxidation of added substrate to CO 2 and water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells
Chaudhuri, S. K., & Lovley, D. R. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt867 · Cited by 1,542
Min, B., & Logan, B. E. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0491026 · Cited by 893
Elshobary, M. E., Zabed, H. M., Yun, J., Zhang, G., & Qi, X. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.251 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Delaney, G. M., Bennetto, H. P., Mason, J. R., Roller, S. D., Stirling, J. L., & Thurston, C. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-27
- ISSN
- 0264-3421 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1828
- OpenAlex
- W2143289121
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron‐transfer coupling in microbial fuel cells. 2. performance of fuel cells containing selected microorganism—mediator—substrate combinations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jctb.280340104
- The paper
- Delaney, G. M., Bennetto, H. P., Mason, J. R., Roller, S. D., Stirling, J. L., & Thurston, C. F. (1984). Electron‐transfer coupling in microbial fuel cells. 2. performance of fuel cells containing selected microorganism—mediator—substrate combinations. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.280340104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.