Brewing and malting technology by-products as raw materials in L-(+)-lactic acid fermentation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Brewer's spent grain (BSG), brewer's yeast (BY), malt rootlets (MR), and soy lecithin (SL) are valuable and abundant by‐products obtained from brewing, malting, and oil industry, respectively. L‐(+)‐lactic acid (LA) is organic acid that has a wide range of application. In this study hydrolysate obtained from BSG and MR mixture (BSGMR), was used in combination with SL and BY extract (BYE) in LA fermentation. The aim was to evaluate the effect and to optimize the addition of SL (0.1% and 0.2%) or BYE (10% and 20%) compared with Tween 80 (0.1%) and yeast extract (0.8%), in batch and fed‐batch LA fermentation. RESULTS: Using optimal SL and BYE concentrations (0.19% and 19.12%, respectively) obtained by response surface methodology (RSM), the highest LA concentration, yield, and volumetric productivity of 28.43 g L−1, 93.03%, and 1.04 g L−1 h−1, respectively, were achieved in batch fermentation, with further increase using fed‐batch fermentation (70.17 g L−1, 94.57%, and 1.22 g L−1 h−1, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results achieved indicated that the combination of industrial by‐products, BSG, MR, SL, and BYE can be used as very suitable fermentation media for LA production, and that SL and BYE could be used as cheap replacements for Tween 80 and YE without decreasing fermentation efficiency. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The addition of BSY extract on its own or in combination with other brewery by-products has a significant positive effect on lactic acid bacteria fermentation.
“The addition of BSY extract on its own or in combination with other brewery by-products has a significant positive effect on lactic acid bacteria fermentation.”
From Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product (2020) · cites this paper as [92]
BSY showed the most potential in the trial when compared to the other by-products tested for growth of lactic acid bacteria.
“BSY showed the most potential in the trial when compared to the other by-products tested.”
From Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product (2020) · cites this paper as [92]
BSY, in combination with other brewery by-products, can be a cost-effective fermentation medium for batch and fed-batch lactic acid fermentation.
“Results suggest that BSY, in combination with other brewery by-products, can be a cost-effective fermentation medium for batch and fed-batch lactic acid fermentation [92].”
From Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product (2020) · cites this paper as [92]
Cites
Vieira, E., Brandão, T., & Ferreira, I. M. P. L. V. O. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf4021619 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Wheat bread biofortification with rootlets, a malting by-product
Waters, D. M., Kingston, W., Jacob, F., Titze, J., Arendt, E. K., & Zannini, E. (2013) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6059 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product
Jaeger, A., Arendt, E. K., Zannini, E., & Sahin, A. W. (2020) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation6040123 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
“Results suggest that BSY, in combination with other brewery by-products, can be a cost-effective fermentation medium for batch and fed-batch lactic acid fermentation [92].”
Background
- Authors
- Radosavljević, M., Pejin, J., Pribić, M., Kocić‐Tanackov, S., Mladenović, D., Djukić‐Vuković, A., & Mojović, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Novi Sad (RS)
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- Corresponding author
- Radosavljević, Miloš
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-12
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 339-347
- ISSN
- 0142-0356 (ISSN-L)
- 0268-2575
- 1097-4660
- OpenAlex
- W2901409647
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- TechnoRep (University of Belgrade – Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy) (acceptedVersion)
- TechnoRep (University of Belgrade – Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Keywords
- L-lactic acid production, brewer's spent grain, soy lecithin, fermentation medium optimization, fed-batch fermentation, batch fermentation, yeast extract replacement, industrial by-product valorization, volumetric productivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review