The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electron microscopic studies of magnetosomes in magnetotactic bacteria
Abstract
Electron microscopic studies on magnetosomes in magnetotactic bacteria have revealed much information on their composition, structure, and even the formation of their mineral phase. The mineral phases of the magnetosomes are of two general types: iron oxides and iron sulfides. Iron oxide‐type magnetosomes contain particles of the ferrimagnetic mineral magnetite (Fe 3 O 4) while the iron sulfide‐type contain ferrimagnetic greigite (Fe 3 S 4), greigite and non‐magnetic pyrite (FeS 2), or possibly ferrimagnetic pyrrhotite (Fe 7 S 8). Regardless of their composition, the crystalline particles in magnetosomes have a narrow size range: approximately 35 to 120 nm. Magnetite crystals in this size range are single‐magnetic‐domains and confer a permanent magnetic dipole moment to the cell. The single‐domain size range for greigite is not known but is probably similar to that for magnetite. The morphology of the particles in the bacterial magnetosomes appears to be species‐specific. Morphologies of magnetite crystals in different species of magnetotactic bacteria include cubooctahedra, parallelepipedal (truncated hexahedral or octahedral prisms), and tooth‐ or bullet‐shaped (anisotropic). Morphologies of greigite particles include cubo‐octahedra and rectangular prismatic. The greigite‐pyrite particles are generally pleomorphic with no consistent crystalline morphology. A membrane has been shown to surround the particles in some organisms and may be involved in the formation of the crystalline phase while also providing physical constraints on the size and the shape of the crystal. These results clearly indicate that the biomineralization process involved in the bacterial magnetosome, a good example of a self‐assembled structure on a nanometer scale, is highly controlled by the organism. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations
Jeevanandam, J., Barhoum, A., Chan, Y. S., Dufresne, A., & Danquah, M. K. (2018) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.98 · Cited by 3,297
Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles by Microorganisms and Their Applications
Li, X., Xu, H., Chen, Z.-S., & Chen, G. (2011) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2011/270974 · Cited by 1,133
An acidic protein aligns magnetosomes along a filamentous structure in magnetotactic bacteria
Scheffel, A., Gruska, M., Faivre, D., Linaroudis, A., Plitzko, J. M., & Schüler, D. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04382 · Cited by 537
The identification and biogeochemical interpretation of fossil magnetotactic bacteria
Kopp, R. E., & Kirschvink, J. L. (2008) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.08.001 · Cited by 393
Bacterial magnetosomes: microbiology, biomineralization and biotechnological applications
Schüler, D., & Frankel, R. B. (1999) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530051547 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bazylinski, D. A., Garratt‐Reed, A. J., & Frankel, R. B.
- Venue
- Microscopy Research and Technique
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 389-401
- ISSN
- 1059-910X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2041059232
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron microscopic studies of magnetosomes in magnetotactic bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jemt.1070270505
- The paper
- Bazylinski, D. A., Garratt‐Reed, A. J., & Frankel, R. B. (1994). Electron microscopic studies of magnetosomes in magnetotactic bacteria. Microscopy Research and Technique. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1070270505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.