Substrate influence on cell shape and cell mechanics: HepG2 cells spread on positively charged surfaces
Abstract
A human hepatoma cell line (HepG2) was cultured on positively and negatively charged polyelectrolytes. Cell/surface adhesion and cell shape evolution were followed with quartz microbalance with dissipation (QCM‐D) and optical microscopy as a function of time, respectively. In particular, substrates coated with poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI) led to fast cell attachment and further spreading, with average maximum frequency Δ f = 79 Hz and dissipation Δ D = 40 × 10−6. On the contrary, no cell spreading was observed on poly(sodium‐4‐styrenesulfonate) (PSS), with Δ f = 33 Hz and Δ D = 4.5 × 10−6. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to investigate the influence of cell shape on its mechanical properties. Considering the cells as an homogenous solid material, the corresponding elastic modulus was estimated using the Hertz model. The elastic modulus was calculated at the central part of the cell, and the average values obtained were 191 ± 14 Pa and 941 ± 58 Pa for cells adsorbed on PSS and PEI, respectively. Thus, different cell–substrate interaction implied different cell mechanical properties reflected in a higher elastic modulus for stronger cell/substrate interaction. The combination of QCM‐D, AFM, and optical microscopy allowed the online study of the cell adhesion process, and the mechanical properties of the adhered cells. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HepG2 seeded on polystyrene well plates with and without coating exhibited significant differences in morphology, distribution, and functions such as particle uptake or P450-dependent detoxification.
“The hepatoma cell line cell line HepG2, which is widely used not only for liver-associated research, seeded on polystyrene well plates with and without coating exhibited significant differences in their morphology, distribution, and functions such as particle uptake or P450-dependent detoxification (Saravia and Toca-Herrera, 2009; Prats-Mateu et al., 2014).”
From In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards (2019) · cites this paper as Saravia and Toca-Herrera, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards
Hirsch, C., & Schildknecht, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01484 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
- Authors
- Saravia, V., & Toca‐Herrera, J. L.
- Venue
- Microscopy Research and Technique
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-29
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 957-964
- ISSN
- 1059-910X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2049929325
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Microscopy Research and Technique (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cell spreading, cell shape, cell mechanics, cell-substrate adhesion, positively charged surfaces, poly(ethyleneimine), polystyrene sulfonate, HepG2 cells, elastic modulus, Hertz model, atomic force microscopy, hepatoma cells
- MeSH terms
- Cell Adhesion, Elasticity, Humans, Microscopy, Time Factors, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Shape, Hep G2 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review