Influence of HepG2 cell shape on nanoparticle uptake
Abstract
Cell mechanics provides insights in cell responses to external stress, which is an important parameter known to influence a variety of cell functions. Understanding the interdependence between mechanical stimulus, cell shape and function is essential in controlling cell culture microenvironment. In this paper, we report on the effect of cationic and anionic interfaces on cell shape and nanoparticle uptake activity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells HepG2. The shape of HepG2 cells changed from a round‐like shape to a spread‐like form exhibiting lamellar protrusions by incubating them on coated polystyrene well plates with polystyrene sulfonate and poly‐ethylene imine (PEI), respectively. This change in shape of HepG2 cells did not influence the uptake of 49‐nm particles (which entered the cells by diffusion). However, the internalization of 240‐nm diameter particles was larger on cells seeded on cationic PEI. Particle uptake was measured at 4°C and 37°C; the optimal incubation time was 6 h. Cell shape and particle uptake were monitored by fluorescence and confocal microscopy. Quantification of particle internalization was carried out with flow cytometry. Microsc. Res. Tech. 77:560–565, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HepG2 seeded on polystyrene well plates with and without coating exhibited significant differences in morphology, distribution, and functions such as particle uptake or P450-dependent detoxification.
“The hepatoma cell line cell line HepG2, which is widely used not only for liver-associated research, seeded on polystyrene well plates with and without coating exhibited significant differences in their morphology, distribution, and functions such as particle uptake or P450-dependent detoxification (Saravia and Toca-Herrera, 2009; Prats-Mateu et al., 2014).”
From In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards (2019) · cites this paper as Prats-Mateu et al., 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards
Hirsch, C., & Schildknecht, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01484 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
- Authors
- Prats‐Mateu, B., Ertl, P., & Toca‐Herrera, J. L.
- Affiliations
- AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT)
- Department of Nanobiotechnology Institute for Biophysics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences 1190 Vienna Austria
- ORCID
- Ertl, Peter
- Venue
- Microscopy Research and Technique
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-08
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 560-565
- ISSN
- 1059-910X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0029
- OpenAlex
- W1836982097
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Microscopy Research and Technique (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- HepG2 cells, cell shape, nanoparticle uptake, cell mechanics, hepatocellular carcinoma, cationic surfaces, anionic surfaces, polyethyleneimine, polystyrene sulfonate, particle internalization, cell spreading
- MeSH terms
- Biological Transport, Diffusion, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Polyethyleneimine, Polystyrenes, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Shape, Nanoparticles, Hep G2 Cells, Cellular Microenvironment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review