The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research
Abstract
Discourse analysis is becoming an increasingly common approach in planning and environmental policy research. This paper asserts that the generic treatment of discourse analysis obscures distinct approaches in which ‘discourses’ can combine different elements of text, systems of thought and action. Textually oriented approaches have been more prevalent during the 1990s, but this paper explores a different approach, grounded in the theory of Michel Foucault, which broadens discourse to embrace social action. Comparing and contrasting two studies that have utilized this approach, the paper suggests that there is considerable room for variation concerning the subjects of study, the institutional scale of analyses, the methods of investigation and process of analysis. Nevertheless, this paper identifies certain core elements of a Foucauldian discourse analytic approach. The paper concludes that this emerging approach to discourse analysis promises considerable insights if applied more widely in planning and environmental research. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1980) · Cited by 22,286
The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction.
Vera, H., & Foucault, M. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065177 · Cited by 5,073
Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810503 · Cited by 4,681
The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,184
Foucault, M. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203406373 · Cited by 3,740
The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception.
Loudon, J. B., Foucault, M., & Smith, A. M. S. (1974) · Man · doi:10.2307/2800095 · Cited by 3,466
Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason
Foucault, M., & Cooper, D. (1961) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203278796 · Cited by 3,302
An Introduction to Social Constructionism
Burr, V. (1995) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203299968 · Cited by 3,286
Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies
Healey, P. (2006) · doi:10.25405/ncl.34571748.v1 · Cited by 2,484
The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-1513 · Cited by 2,233
Cited by
Policy networks and the local organisation of tourism
Dredge, D. (2006) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2004.10.003 · Cited by 586
Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil
Mammadova, A., Behagel, J., & Masiero, M. (2020) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.03.008 · Cited by 26
(2021) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819871-1.00011-7 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharp, L., & Richardson, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-209
- ISSN
- 1522-7200 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-908X
- OpenAlex
- W1966192479
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jepp.88
- The paper
- Sharp, L., & Richardson, T. (2001). Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.88
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.