Insights into the early evolution of SOX genes from expression analyses in a ctenophore
Abstract
SOX genes encode transcription factors acting in various developmental processes in bilaterian animals, such as stem cell maintenance and the control of specification and differentiation of cell types in a variety of contexts, notably in the developing nervous system. To gain insights into the early evolution of this important family of developmental regulators, we investigated the expression of one subgroup B, two subgroup E, one subgroup F and two divergent SOX genes in the cydippid larva and in the adult of the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus. Transcripts of the two unclassified SOX (PpiSOX2/12) were detected in the female germ line and in various populations of putative somatic stem cells/undifferentiated progenitors. The remaining genes had spatially restricted expression patterns in ciliated epithelial cells, notably within neuro‐sensory territories. These data are compatible with an ancient involvement of SOX proteins in controlling aspects of stem cell maintenance, cellular differentiation and specification, notably within neuro‐sensory epithelia. In addition, the results highlight the complexity of the ctenophore anatomy and suggest that the SOX played an important role in the elaboration of the unique ctenophore body plan during evolution, through multiple gene co‐option. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 310B:650–667, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sox genes are expressed in putative progenitors that give rise to neurosensory cells in the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus.
“Interestingly, Sox genes are also expressed in putative progenitors that give rise to neurosensory cells in the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus [73].”
From Evolution of eumetazoan nervous systems: insights from cnidarians (2015) · cites this paper as [73]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Jager, M., Quéinnec, E., Chiori, R., Le Guyader, H., & Manuel, M.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Évolution Paris Seine (FR)
- ORCID
- Manuel, Michaël
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-21
- Volume
- 310B
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 650-667
- ISSN
- 1552-5007 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5015
- OpenAlex
- W2116468359
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
- Keywords
- Sox genes, ctenophores, Pleurobrachia pileus, gene expression, stem cell maintenance, adult stem cells, female germline, ciliated epithelium, gene co-option, transcription factors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Ectoderm, Endoderm, Female, Germ Cells, Larva, Evolution, Molecular, Ctenophora, SOX Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review