Cited by 46Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

Insights into the early evolution of SOX genes from expression analyses in a ctenophore

Jager, Muriel, Quéinnec, Eric, Chiori, Roxane, Le Guyader, Hervé, Manuel, Michaël·2008·Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution

Abstract

SOX genes encode transcription factors acting in various developmental processes in bilaterian animals, such as stem cell maintenance and the control of specification and differentiation of cell types in a variety of contexts, notably in the developing nervous system. To gain insights into the early evolution of this important family of developmental regulators, we investigated the expression of one subgroup B, two subgroup E, one subgroup F and two divergent SOX genes in the cydippid larva and in the adult of the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus. Transcripts of the two unclassified SOX (PpiSOX2/12) were detected in the female germ line and in various populations of putative somatic stem cells/undifferentiated progenitors. The remaining genes had spatially restricted expression patterns in ciliated epithelial cells, notably within neuro‐sensory territories. These data are compatible with an ancient involvement of SOX proteins in controlling aspects of stem cell maintenance, cellular differentiation and specification, notably within neuro‐sensory epithelia. In addition, the results highlight the complexity of the ctenophore anatomy and suggest that the SOX played an important role in the elaboration of the unique ctenophore body plan during evolution, through multiple gene co‐option. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 310B:650–667, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jez.b.21244

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sox genes are expressed in putative progenitors that give rise to neurosensory cells in the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus.

    “Interestingly, Sox genes are also expressed in putative progenitors that give rise to neurosensory cells in the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus [73].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 46

Authors
Jager, M., Quéinnec, E., Chiori, R., Le Guyader, H., & Manuel, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Évolution Paris Seine (FR)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10-21
Volume
310B
Issue
8
Pages
650-667
ISSN
  • 1552-5007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5015
OpenAlex
W2116468359
Cited by
46
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
Sox genes, ctenophores, Pleurobrachia pileus, gene expression, stem cell maintenance, adult stem cells, female germline, ciliated epithelium, gene co-option, transcription factors
MeSH terms
Animals, Ectoderm, Endoderm, Female, Germ Cells, Larva, Evolution, Molecular, Ctenophora, SOX Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review