Cited by 50Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchGenomics and Rare DiseasesGlobal Health Workforce Issues

Readiness of clinical genetic healthcare professionals to provide genomic medicine: An Australian census

Nisselle, Amy, Macciocca, Ivan, McKenzie, Fiona, Vuong, Hannah, Dunlop, Kate, McClaren, Belinda, Metcalfe, Sylvia, Gaff, Clara +1 more·2019·Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

We aimed to determine capacity and readiness of Australian clinical genetic healthcare professionals to provide genomic medicine. An online survey was administered to individuals with genetic counseling or clinical genetics qualifications in Australia. Data collected included: education, certification, continuing professional development (CPD), employment, and genetic versus genomic clinical practice. Of the estimated 630 clinical genetic healthcare professionals in Australia, 354 completed the survey (56.2% response rate). Explanatory interviews were conducted with 5.5% of the genetic counselor respondents. Those working clinically reported being involved in aspects of whole exome or genome sequencing (48.6% genetic counselors, 88.6% clinical geneticists). Most genetic counselors (74.2%) and clinical geneticists (87.0%) had attended genomics CPD in the last two years, with 61.0% and 39.1% self‐funding, respectively. Genetic counselors desire broad involvement in genomics, including understanding classifying and interpreting results to better counsel patients. The majority of respondents (89.9%) were satisfied with their job and 91.6% planned to work in genetics until retirement. However, 14.1% of the genetic counselors in clinical roles and 24.6% of the clinical geneticists planned to retire within 10 years. This is the first national audit of clinical genetic healthcare professionals, revealing the Australian workforce is motivated and prepared to embrace new models to deliver genomic medicine but consideration of education and training is required to meet demand.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jgc4.1101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nisselle, A., Macciocca, I., McKenzie, F., Vuong, H., Dunlop, K., McClaren, B., Metcalfe, S., Gaff, C., & for the Australian Genomics Workforce & Education Working Group
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance (AU)
  • Australian Genomics Health Alliance (AU)
Corresponding author
Gaff, Clara
Venue
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-19
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
367-377
ISSN
  • 1059-7700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3599
OpenAlex
W2915196318
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Genetic Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • State Government of Victoria
  • Medical Research Council (GNT1113531)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
genomic medicine, genetic counselors, clinical geneticists, career readiness, continuing professional development, exome sequencing, whole genome sequencing, workforce planning, job satisfaction, retirement intentions, Australian workforce
MeSH terms
Counselors, Australia, Female, Genetic Counseling, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Censuses, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review