Readiness of clinical genetic healthcare professionals to provide genomic medicine: An Australian census
Abstract
We aimed to determine capacity and readiness of Australian clinical genetic healthcare professionals to provide genomic medicine. An online survey was administered to individuals with genetic counseling or clinical genetics qualifications in Australia. Data collected included: education, certification, continuing professional development (CPD), employment, and genetic versus genomic clinical practice. Of the estimated 630 clinical genetic healthcare professionals in Australia, 354 completed the survey (56.2% response rate). Explanatory interviews were conducted with 5.5% of the genetic counselor respondents. Those working clinically reported being involved in aspects of whole exome or genome sequencing (48.6% genetic counselors, 88.6% clinical geneticists). Most genetic counselors (74.2%) and clinical geneticists (87.0%) had attended genomics CPD in the last two years, with 61.0% and 39.1% self‐funding, respectively. Genetic counselors desire broad involvement in genomics, including understanding classifying and interpreting results to better counsel patients. The majority of respondents (89.9%) were satisfied with their job and 91.6% planned to work in genetics until retirement. However, 14.1% of the genetic counselors in clinical roles and 24.6% of the clinical geneticists planned to retire within 10 years. This is the first national audit of clinical genetic healthcare professionals, revealing the Australian workforce is motivated and prepared to embrace new models to deliver genomic medicine but consideration of education and training is required to meet demand.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Geneticists and genetic counsellors seem to be better trained in genomics.
“Since geneticists and genetic counsellors seem to be better trained in genomics [41], their involvement appears to be essential.”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Erdmann, A., Rehmann-Sutter, C., & Bozzaro, C. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00682-8 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Stark, Z., Nisselle, A., McClaren, B., Lynch, F., Best, S., Long, J. C., Martyn, M., Patel, C., Schlapbach, L. J., Barnett, C., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-019-0429-y · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Nisselle, A., Macciocca, I., McKenzie, F., Vuong, H., Dunlop, K., McClaren, B., Metcalfe, S., Gaff, C., & for the Australian Genomics Workforce & Education Working Group
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance (AU)
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gaff, Clara
- Venue
- Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-19
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 367-377
- ISSN
- 1059-7700 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3599
- OpenAlex
- W2915196318
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Genetic Counseling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- State Government of Victoria
- Medical Research Council (GNT1113531)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Keywords
- genomic medicine, genetic counselors, clinical geneticists, career readiness, continuing professional development, exome sequencing, whole genome sequencing, workforce planning, job satisfaction, retirement intentions, Australian workforce
- MeSH terms
- Counselors, Australia, Female, Genetic Counseling, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Censuses, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review