Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation

Open access
Hsu, N. C., Jeong, M.‐J., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A. M., Hansell, R., Seftor, C. S., Huang, J., Tsay, S.‐C.·2013·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The aerosol products retrieved using the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) collection 5.1 Deep Blue algorithm have provided useful information about aerosol properties over bright‐reflecting land surfaces, such as desert, semiarid, and urban regions. However, many components of the C5.1 retrieval algorithm needed to be improved; for example, the use of a static surface database to estimate surface reflectances. This is particularly important over regions of mixed vegetated and nonvegetated surfaces, which may undergo strong seasonal changes in land cover. In order to address this issue, we develop a hybrid approach, which takes advantage of the combination of precalculated surface reflectance database and normalized difference vegetation index in determining the surface reflectance for aerosol retrievals. As a result, the spatial coverage of aerosol data generated by the enhanced Deep Blue algorithm has been extended from the arid and semiarid regions to the entire land areas. In this paper, the changes made in the enhanced Deep Blue algorithm regarding the surface reflectance estimation, aerosol model selection, and cloud screening schemes for producing the MODIS collection 6 aerosol products are discussed. A similar approach has also been applied to the algorithm that generates the Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor (SeaWiFS) Deep Blue products. Based upon our preliminary results of comparing the enhanced Deep Blue aerosol products with the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) measurements, the expected error of the Deep Blue aerosol optical thickness (AOT) is estimated to be better than 0.05 + 20%. Using 10 AERONET sites with long‐term time series, 79% of the best quality Deep Blue AOT values are found to fall within this expected error.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jgrd.50712

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,164

Metadata

Authors
Hsu, N. C., Jeong, M. ‐., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A. M., Hansell, R., Seftor, C. S., Huang, J., & Tsay, S. ‐.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2013-08-27
Volume
118
Issue
16
Pages
9296-9315
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
  • 2169-8996
OpenAlex
W1606767976
Cited by
1,164
References
1
FWCI
25.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jgrd.50712
The paper
Hsu, N. C., Jeong, M. ‐., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A. M., Hansell, R., Seftor, C. S., Huang, J., & Tsay, S. ‐. (2013). Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50712

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.