The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Methodological progress note: The case for mixed methods in quality improvement and research projects
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This convergent mixed method approach will allow quantification of feasibility and acceptability while qualitatively assessing user experiences using CFIR and sociotechnical theory.
“This convergent mixed method approach will allow us to quantify the feasibility and acceptability of the ICU-PAUSE tool while also qualitatively assessing user experiences with the tool using the established implementation frameworks of CFIR and sociotechnical theory [13,14,17].”
From Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Creswell JW, 2003, Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 209
- 10.1016/j.acap.2013.06.010 · DOI
- 10.12788/jhm.3570 · DOI
- Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2007, A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research, Qual Rep, 12, 281
- 10.1007/s11606-020-05786-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-017-4104-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.breast.2011.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/jhm.12802 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-019-04964-1 · DOI
- 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000360 · DOI
- 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000300 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13012-021-01126-y · DOI
- 10.1186/s13063-019-3439-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Albright, K., & Jones, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Veterans Health Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Christine D.
- Venue
- Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-03-16
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 468-471
- ISSN
- 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-5606
- OpenAlex
- W4221111584
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Keywords
- mixed methods, quality improvement, research methodology
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Quality Improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
