A Hospitalist mentoring program to sustain interest in healthcare careers in under‐represented minority undergraduates
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ethnic minorities in the United States have decreased access to healthcare and disproportionately high morbidity and mortality. There has been minimal growth in the number of minority physicians despite their important role in reducing health disparities. Under‐represented minority (URM) undergraduate students are 50% less likely to maintain interest in medical careers. METHODS: Denver Health and the University of Colorado, Denver enrolled URM students interested in healthcare careers in a year‐long, comprehensive program called the Healthcare Interest Program (HIP) that included pairing each student with a hospitalist for mentoring and job shadowing. At the end of the first year of HIP, students were surveyed, and 2 years later they were contacted for follow‐up. RESULTS: Twenty‐three students enrolled and all completed the program. Nineteen (83%) completed the survey and all “strongly agreed” that participating in HIP expanded their perceptions of what they might accomplish and increased their confidence in their ability to participate in a healthcare profession. Two‐year follow‐up was available for 21 students (91%). Twenty (95%) remained committed to a career in healthcare, 18 (86%) had graduated, and 6 (29%) were enrolled in postgraduate healthcare training. CONCLUSION: The interest of undergraduate minority prehealth students in healthcare careers may be maintained by participation in a multifaceted, year‐long mentoring program such as HIP. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:586–589. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Programs that expose students to health care environments have a positive impact on their decision to pursue health care careers.
“Also, programs that expose students to health care environments have a positive impact on their decision to pursue health care careers.20–22”
From Impact of the Bronx Community Health Leaders Program for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Prehealth Students (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robles, J., Qadeer, R., Reyes Adames, T., & Naqvi, Z. (2021) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2021.0065 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cervantes, L., Chu, E., Nogar, C., Burden, M., Fischer, S., Valtierra, C., & Albert, R. K.
- Affiliations
- Denver Health Medical Center (US)
- Boulder Community Hospital (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 586-589
- ISSN
- 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-5606
- OpenAlex
- W2146691070
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Keywords
- mentoring programs, underrepresented minority students, hospitalists, job shadowing, minority physicians, health disparities, career retention, health workforce diversity
- MeSH terms
- Career Choice, Ethnicity, Female, Health Occupations, Humans, Male, Mentors, United States, Hospitalists, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review