Implementation of a multicenter performance improvement program for early detection and treatment of severe sepsis in general medical–surgical wards
Abstract
Sepsis is a leading cause of in-hospital death, and evidence suggests a higher mortality in patients presenting with sepsis on the ward compared to those presenting to the emergency department. Ward patients who develop severe sepsis may have poor outcomes for a variety of reasons, including delayed diagnosis, lack of readily available staffing, and delayed treatment. We report on a multihospital quality improvement program for early detection and treatment of sepsis on general medical-surgical wards. We describe a multipronged approach to improve severe sepsis outcomes using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Plan-Do-Study-Act model. Sixty sites engaged in a collaborative implementation process that aligned people, process, and technology. Based on our experience, we recommend a stepwise approach to implement such a program: (1) both administrative and clinical leadership commit to a common goal; (2) appoint clinical champions and give them authority to engage other clinicians to improve timeliness of interventions; (3) map workflows and processes to rely heavily on the nursing staff's ability to evaluate and report severe sepsis screening results; (4) if available, design and deploy technology with the assistance of clinical informaticians (eg, to enable electronic health records-based continuous screening); (5) to determine success, consider tracking screening compliance and process, and outcome measures such as length of stay and mortality. Journal of Hospital Med…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sepsis performance improvement programs generally include screening, education, measurement of bundle performance, patient outcomes, and actions for identified opportunities.
“Sepsis performance improvement programs generally consist of sepsis screening, education, measurement of sepsis bundle performance, patient outcomes, and actions for identified opportunities (25,26).”
From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005337 · Cited by 2,935 · see citing works
Self-citationRhee, C., Wang, R., Zhang, Z., Fram, D., Kadri, S. S., & Klompas, M. (2019) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000003817 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y · Cited by 5,082 · see citing works
Self-citationMachine learning for early detection of sepsis: an internal and temporal validation study
Bedoya, A. D., Futoma, J., Clement, M. E., Corey, K., Brajer, N., Lin, A., Simons, M. G., Gao, M., Nichols, M., Balu, S., et al. (2020) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa006 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schorr, C., Odden, A., Evans, L., Escobar, G. J., Gandhi, S., Townsend, S., & Levy, M.
- Affiliations
- Cooper University Hospital (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- New York University (US)
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- California Pacific Medical Center (US)
- Rhode Island Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S32-S39
- ISSN
- 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-5606
- OpenAlex
- W2548578047
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- severe sepsis, early sepsis detection, sepsis screening, quality improvement, Plan-Do-Study-Act, clinical champions, workflow mapping, sepsis mortality, length of hospital stay, multicenter collaboration
- MeSH terms
- Hospital Units, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Severity of Illness Index, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Hospital Mortality, Sepsis, Guideline Adherence, Early Diagnosis, Quality Improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review