Cited by 47Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Quality and Management

Implementation of a multicenter performance improvement program for early detection and treatment of severe sepsis in general medical–surgical wards

Schorr, Christa, Odden, Andrew, Evans, Laura, Escobar, Gabriel J., Gandhi, Snehal, Townsend, Sean, Levy, Mitchell·2016·Journal of Hospital Medicine

Abstract

Sepsis is a leading cause of in-hospital death, and evidence suggests a higher mortality in patients presenting with sepsis on the ward compared to those presenting to the emergency department. Ward patients who develop severe sepsis may have poor outcomes for a variety of reasons, including delayed diagnosis, lack of readily available staffing, and delayed treatment. We report on a multihospital quality improvement program for early detection and treatment of sepsis on general medical-surgical wards. We describe a multipronged approach to improve severe sepsis outcomes using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Plan-Do-Study-Act model. Sixty sites engaged in a collaborative implementation process that aligned people, process, and technology. Based on our experience, we recommend a stepwise approach to implement such a program: (1) both administrative and clinical leadership commit to a common goal; (2) appoint clinical champions and give them authority to engage other clinicians to improve timeliness of interventions; (3) map workflows and processes to rely heavily on the nursing staff's ability to evaluate and report severe sepsis screening results; (4) if available, design and deploy technology with the assistance of clinical informaticians (eg, to enable electronic health records-based continuous screening); (5) to determine success, consider tracking screening compliance and process, and outcome measures such as length of stay and mortality. Journal of Hospital Med…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jhm.2656

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sepsis performance improvement programs generally include screening, education, measurement of bundle performance, patient outcomes, and actions for identified opportunities.

    “Sepsis performance improvement programs generally consist of sepsis screening, education, measurement of sepsis bundle performance, patient outcomes, and actions for identified opportunities (25,26).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schorr, C., Odden, A., Evans, L., Escobar, G. J., Gandhi, S., Townsend, S., & Levy, M.
Affiliations
  • Cooper University Hospital (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • California Pacific Medical Center (US)
  • Rhode Island Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11
Volume
11
Issue
S1
Pages
S32-S39
ISSN
  • 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-5606
OpenAlex
W2548578047
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
severe sepsis, early sepsis detection, sepsis screening, quality improvement, Plan-Do-Study-Act, clinical champions, workflow mapping, sepsis mortality, length of hospital stay, multicenter collaboration
MeSH terms
Hospital Units, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Severity of Illness Index, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Hospital Mortality, Sepsis, Guideline Adherence, Early Diagnosis, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review