Cited by 59Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Age-specific reference values for cerebrospinal fluid protein concentration in neonates and young infants.

Open access
Shah, Samir S., Ebberson, Jessica, Kestenbaum, Lori A., Hodinka, Richard L., Zorc, Joseph J.·2011·Journal of Hospital Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein values decline over the first few months of life as the infant's blood-CSF barrier matures. However, published studies differ in the reported rate, timing, and magnitude of this decline. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the age-related changes in CSF protein concentration and to determine accurate, age-specific reference values for neonates and young infants. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: This cross-sectional study included infants age 56 days or younger who had a lumbar puncture performed in the emergency department of an urban tertiary care children's hospital between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2007. Infants with conditions associated with elevated CSF protein concentrations, including traumatic lumbar puncture and bacterial or viral meningitis, were excluded. RESULTS: Of 1064 infants undergoing lumbar puncture, 375 (35%) met inclusion criteria. The median CSF protein value was 58 mg/dL (interquartile range: 48-72 mg/dL). In linear regression, the CSF protein concentration decreased 6.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4%-8.1%; P < 0.001) with each 1 week increase in age. The 95th percentile values were 115 mg/dL for infants ≤28 days and 89 mg/dL for infants 29-56 days. The 95th percentile values by age category were as follows: ages 0-14 days, 132 mg/dL; ages 15-28 days, 100 mg/dL; ages 29-42 days, 89 mg/dL; and ages 43-56 days, 83 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: We quantify the age-related decline in CSF protein concentration among infants 56 days of age and younger and provide age-specific reference values. The values reported here represent the largest series to-date for this age group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jhm.711

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When possible, a full 10-day course of penicillin is preferred, even if ampicillin was initially provided for possible sepsis.

    “When possible, a full 10-day course of penicillin is preferred, even if ampicillin was initially provided for possible sepsis (648–650).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [649]

    The Results report only that some infants received antibiotics before lumbar puncture, and the Discussion addresses whether ampicillin interfered with the CSF protein assay. Searches for a 10-day penicillin course and for ampicillin treatment of possible sepsis found no treatment recommendation in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 59

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [9]McMillan JA Feigin RD DeAngelis C Jones MD Oski's pediatrics: principles & practice 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 4th
  2. [10]Robertson J Shilkofski N Johns Hopkins: The Harriet Lane Handbook: A Manual for Pediatric House Officers 2005 Elsevier Mosby Philadelphia 17
  3. [11]Frank G Shah SS Catallozzi MC Zaoutis LB The Philadelphia Guide: Inpatient Pediatrics 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia
  4. [17]Remington JS Klein JO Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant 2006 Elsevier Saunders Philadelphia 6th
  5. [19]Menkes JH Sarnat HB Child Neurology 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 6th
  6. [20]Swaiman KF Ashwal S Pediatric Neurology: Principles and Practice 1999 Mosby St. Louis 3rd

Authors
Shah, S. S., Ebberson, J., Kestenbaum, L. A., Hodinka, R. L., & Zorc, J. J.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Shah, Samir S.
Venue
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
22-27
ISSN
  • 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-5606
OpenAlex
W2013140029
Cited by
59
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K01AI073729, K01-AI-73729)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid protein, age-related reference values, neonates, infants, lumbar puncture
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Reference Values, Philadelphia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review