The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mandibular function in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaca fascicularis: An in vivo approach to Stress Analysis of the mandible
Abstract
Single‐element and/or rosette strain gages were bonded to mandibular cortical bone in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaca fascicularis. Five galago and eleven macaque bone strain experiments were performed and analyzed. In vivo bone strain was recorded from the lateral surface of the mandibular corpus below the postcanine tooth row during transducer biting and during mastication and ingestion of food objects. In macaques and galagos, the mandibular corpus on the balancing side is primarily bent in the sagittal plane during mastication and is both twisted about its long axis and bent in the sagittal plane during transducer biting. On the working side, it is primarily twisted about its long axis and directly sheared perpendicular to its long axis, and portions of it are bent in the sagittal plane during mastication and molar transducer biting. In macaques, the mandibular corpus on each side is primarily bent in the sagittal plane and twisted during incisal transducer biting and ingestion of food objects, and it is transversely bent and slightly twisted during jaw opening. Since galagos usually refused to bite the transducer or food objects with their incisors, an adequate characterization of mandibular stress patterns during these behaviors was not possible. In galagos the mandibular corpus experiences very little transverse bending stress during jaw opening, perhaps in part due to its unfused mandibular symphysis. Marked differences in the patterns of mandibular bone strain were present between galagos and macaques during the masticatory power stroke and during transducer biting. Galagos consistently had much more strain on the working side of the mandibular corpus than on the balancing side. These experiments support the hypothesis that galagos, in contrast to macaques, employ a larger amount of working‐side muscle force relative to the balancing‐side muscle force during unilateral biting and mastication, and that the fused mandibular symphysis is an adaption to use a maximal amount of balancing‐side muscle force during unilateral biting and mastication. These experiments also demonstrate the effects that rosette position, bite force magnitudes, and types of food eaten have on recorded mandibular strain patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dental Functional Morphology: How Teeth Work
Lucas, P. W. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735011 · Cited by 550
Rubin, C. T., & Lanyon, L. E. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.101.1.187 · Cited by 498
Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling
Rubin, C. T., & Lanyon, L. E. (1984) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80031-4 · Cited by 416
Mandibular Function and Biomechanical Stress and Scaling
HYLANDER, W. L. (1985) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/25.2.315 · Cited by 337
Self-citationHylander, W. L., Johnson, K. R., & Crompton, A. W. (1987) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330720304 · Cited by 268
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hylander, W. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Morphology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-02
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-296
- ISSN
- 0362-2525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2098253011
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mandibular function in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaca fascicularis: An in vivo approach to Stress Analysis of the mandible. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmor.1051590208
- The paper
- Hylander, W. L. (1979). Mandibular function in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaca fascicularis: An in vivo approach to Stress Analysis of the mandible. Journal of Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051590208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.