Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A three‐dimensional muscle model: A quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles

Woittiez, R. D., Huijing, P. A., Boom, H. B. K., Rozendal, R. H.·1984·Journal of Morphology

Abstract

A three‐dimensional muscle model with complex geometry is described and tested against experimental data. Using this model, several muscles were constructed. These muscles have equal optimum length but differ in architecture. The force exerted by the constructed muscles, in relation to their actual length and velocity of shortening, is discussed. Generally speaking, the constructed muscles with considerable pennation have great fiber angles, a great physiological cross section, a narrow active and steep passive length‐force relation, and a low maximal velocity of shortening. The maximal power (force times velocity) delivered by the constructed muscles is shown to be almost independent of the architecture of the muscles. The steepness of the passive length‐force relation is determined mainly by the shortest fibers within the group of constructed muscles, wheras maximal velocity of shortening and the width of the active length‐force relation are determined mainly by the longest fibers. The validity of the three‐dimensional muscle model with respect to some morphological and functional characteristics is tested. Length‐force relations of constructed muscles are compared with the actual length‐force relations of mm. gastrocnemii mediales and mm. semimembranosi of male Wistar rats. Moreover, actual fiber angle, fiber length, and muscle thickness of three mm. gastrocnemii mediales are compared with values found for constructed muscles. It is concluded that the three‐dimensional muscle model closely approximates the actual muscle form and function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmor.1051820107

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Woittiez, R. D., Huijing, P. A., Boom, H. B. K., & Rozendal, R. H.
Venue
Journal of Morphology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-10
Volume
182
Issue
1
Pages
95-113
ISSN
  • 0362-2525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4687
OpenAlex
W1991602457
Cited by
234
References
4
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A three‐dimensional muscle model: A quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmor.1051820107
The paper
Woittiez, R. D., Huijing, P. A., Boom, H. B. K., & Rozendal, R. H. (1984). A three‐dimensional muscle model: A quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles. Journal of Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051820107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.