The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A three‐dimensional muscle model: A quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles
Abstract
A three‐dimensional muscle model with complex geometry is described and tested against experimental data. Using this model, several muscles were constructed. These muscles have equal optimum length but differ in architecture. The force exerted by the constructed muscles, in relation to their actual length and velocity of shortening, is discussed. Generally speaking, the constructed muscles with considerable pennation have great fiber angles, a great physiological cross section, a narrow active and steep passive length‐force relation, and a low maximal velocity of shortening. The maximal power (force times velocity) delivered by the constructed muscles is shown to be almost independent of the architecture of the muscles. The steepness of the passive length‐force relation is determined mainly by the shortest fibers within the group of constructed muscles, wheras maximal velocity of shortening and the width of the active length‐force relation are determined mainly by the longest fibers. The validity of the three‐dimensional muscle model with respect to some morphological and functional characteristics is tested. Length‐force relations of constructed muscles are compared with the actual length‐force relations of mm. gastrocnemii mediales and mm. semimembranosi of male Wistar rats. Moreover, actual fiber angle, fiber length, and muscle thickness of three mm. gastrocnemii mediales are compared with values found for constructed muscles. It is concluded that the three‐dimensional muscle model closely approximates the actual muscle form and function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres
Gordon, A. M., Huxley, A. F., & Julian, F. J. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909 · Cited by 3,152
Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles.
Close, R. I. (1972) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.129 · Cited by 1,890
Spector, S. A., Gardiner, P. F., Zernicke, R. F., Roy, R. R., & Edgerton, V. R. (1980) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1980.44.5.951 · Cited by 397
Akster, H. (1981) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/bf00210022 · Cited by 33
Cited by
Narici, M. V., Binzoni, T., Hiltbrand, E., Fasel, J., Terrier, F., & Cerretelli, P. (1996) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021685 · Cited by 555
van Dieën, J. H., Cholewicki, J., & Radebold, A. (2003) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000058939.51147.55 · Cited by 466
Hill-Based Muscle Models: A Systems Engineering Perspective
Winters, J. M. (1990) · Multiple Muscle Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9030-5_5 · Cited by 386
McGill, S. M. (1992) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90259-4 · Cited by 300
Muscle fiber angle, segment bulging and architectural gear ratio in segmented musculature
Brainerd, E. L., & Azizi, E. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01770 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Woittiez, R. D., Huijing, P. A., Boom, H. B. K., & Rozendal, R. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Morphology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-10
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-113
- ISSN
- 0362-2525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1991602457
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A three‐dimensional muscle model: A quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmor.1051820107
- The paper
- Woittiez, R. D., Huijing, P. A., Boom, H. B. K., & Rozendal, R. H. (1984). A three‐dimensional muscle model: A quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles. Journal of Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051820107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.