The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanisms of hind foot reversal in climbing mammals
Abstract
Many climbing mammals are able to reverse normal hind foot posture to effect the grip necessary to descend headfirst or to hang upside down. Such hind foot reversal is known in sciurids, procyonids, felids, viverrids, tupaiids, prosimians, and marsupials. The joint movements involved, however, have never been documented unequivocally although various interpretations (some contradictory) have been made. We report here radiographic data from species of the genera Didelphis, Felis, Nasua, Nycticebus, Potos, Sciurus , and Tupaia . In the six eutherians studied, three joints are involved, and there is a common pattern in the mechanism: crurotalar plantarflexion, subtalar inversion, and transverse tarsal supination. Hind foot reversal represents the development of an unusual degree of excursion at these joints, rather than the appearance of any new type of movement. In Didelphis the mechanism is quite different: a bicondylar, spiral tibiotalar joint is the principal site of inversion/abduction movements. This specialization is characteristic of didelphids and phalangerids, and occurs in the extinct multituberculates as well; it is not found in macropodids (which are like eutherians in crurotalar joint structure) or other marsupial families. This diversity in pedal structure and function is evidently the result of parallel evolution from the type of tibiotalar joint of cynodonts and early mammals. In Morganucodon the bulbous, hemispheroidal proximal surface of the talus bears two tibial facets. These facets are represented in didelphids and multituberculates as sulci, whereas in macropodids and eutherians they developed as the proximal and medial surfaces of the talar trochlea. Among living mammals, the primitive hemispheroidal joint is retained among monotremes as a ball and socket joint.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ability to reverse the hindlimb and descend head first is a signature trait of arboreal specialists [35], [94].”
From Assessing Arboreal Adaptations of Bird Antecedents: Testing the Ecological Setting of the Origin of the Avian Flight Stroke (2011) · cites this paper as [94]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1970.tb02893.x · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-384050-9.50007-6 · DOI
- Dobroruka L. J., 1960, Některé anatomické rozdíly na končetinách veverky (Sciurus vulgaris L.) a sysla (Citellus citellus L.), způsobené vlivem rozdílnych životních podmínek, Věstník Ceskoslovenské Zoologické Společnosti, 24, 97
- 10.5479/si.00810266.47.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330260208 · DOI
- 10.1002/ar.1091540211 · DOI
- Jenkins F. A., 1971, The postcranial skeleton of African cynodonts, Bull. Peab. Mus. Nat. Hist., 36, 1
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1971.tb02189.x · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-384050-9.50008-8 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.220.4598.712 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1976.0022 · DOI
- Krause D. W., 1983, The postcranial skeleton of North American multituberculates, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 150, 199
- Landry S. O., 1965, The basic adaptation of scansorial rodents, Am. Zool., 5, 681
- Lewis O. J., 1980, The joints of the evolving foot. Part I. The ankle joint, J. Anat., 130, 527
- Lewis O. J., 1983, The evolutionary emergence and refinement of the mammalian pattern of foot architecture, J. Anat., 137, 21
- 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01179.x · DOI
- Nowak R. M., 1983, Walker's Mammals of the World, 569
- 10.2307/1379044 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New views on tree shrews: the role of tupaiids in primate supraordinal relationships
Sargis, E. J. (2004) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.10131 · Cited by 88
Dececchi, T. A., & Larsson, H. C. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022292 · Cited by 56
“The ability to reverse the hindlimb and descend head first is a signature trait of arboreal specialists [35,94].”
BackgroundHeinrich, R. E., & Houde, P. (2006) · Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology · doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[422:paovmc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Jenkins, F. A., & McClearn, D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- McClearn, Deedra
- Venue
- Journal of Morphology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-11
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-219
- ISSN
- 0362-2525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2034786102
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Morphology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northern Arizona University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Keywords
- tibiotalar joint, Didelphis, Felis, Nasua, Nycticebus, Potos, Sciurus, tree shrew, marsupials, multituberculates, Morganucodon, parallel evolution, arboreal locomotion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review