Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Morphology of the abdominal wall in the bat, Pteronotus parnellii (Microchiroptera: Mormoopidae): Implications for biosonar vocalization

Lancaster, Winston C., Henson, O. W.·1995·Journal of Morphology

Abstract

We investigated the structure of the abdominal wall of Pteronotus parnellii and made comparisons with eight other species of Microchiroptera and one megachiropteran. Similar to other mammals, the abdominal wall of bats consists of the three flank muscles laterally and the m. rectus abdominis ventrally. In Microchiroptera, flank muscles are mostly confined to dorsal portions of the wall. The mm. transversus abdominis and obdominis and obliquus internus abdominis form the bulk of the wall; the m. obliquus externus is poorly developed. Ventrolaterally, a large portion of the wall is a dense, bilaminar aponeurosis, composed of collagen, elastin, and fibroblasts. The thicker, superficial lamina derives from the mm. obliquus internus and transversus abdominis. The deep lamina is a continuation of the transversalis fascia. Collagen fibers of the two fused laminae are oriented orthogonally, resulting in a resilient, composite fabric. Fascicles of the flank muscles are oriented along the margins of the aponeurosis so that their forces appear to be concentrated onto the aponeurosis. We suggest that this system is adapted for the regulation and generation of intra‐abdominal pressure. The abdominal wall of Pteropus, the one megachiropteran examined, lacks the derived aponeurosis and is similar to other mammals. We consider the abdominal wall of Microchiroptera to be analogous to the diaphragma, in that it functions in the regulation of pressure within body cavities and facilitates biosonar vocalization. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmor.1052230109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Alexander R. McN., 1983, Animal Mechanics
  2. Alexander R. McN., 1988, Elastic Mechanisms in Animal Movement
  3. Chauveau A., 1873, The Comparative Anatomy of the Domesticated Animals
  4. 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90289-Y · DOI
  5. Getty R., 1975, Sisson and Grossman's The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals
  6. Griffin D. R., 1958, Listening in the Dark
  7. Humason G. L., 1972, Animal Tissue Techniques
  8. 10.1007/BF01002772 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lancaster W. C. O. W.Henson Jr. andA. W.Keating(in press) Respiratory muscle activity in relation to vocalization in flying bats.J. Exp. Biol.
  10. Lessertisseur J., 1968, Traité de Zoologie: Anatomie, Systmatique, Biologie, 549
  11. 10.1098/rstl.1872.0008 · doi:10.1098/rstl.1872.0008
  12. 10.2535/ofaj1936.36.3-4_253 · doi:10.2535/ofaj1936.36.3-4_253
  13. Romer A. S., 1970, The Vertebrate Body
  14. Vaughan T. A., 1959, Functional morphology of three bats: Eumops, Myotis, Macrotis, Univ. Kansas Pubs. Mus. Nat. Hist., 12, 1
  15. Vaughan T. A., 1970, The Biology of Bats, 140
  16. Viidik A., 1980, The Biology of Collagen, 256
  17. Wainwright S. A., 1976, Mechanical Design in Organisms
  18. 10.1007/BF00398339 · doi:10.1007/bf00398339
  19. Winckler G., 1950, Contribution a l'étude des muscles larges de la paroi abdominale, Arch. Anat. Histol. Embryol., Strassbourg, 33, 159

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Lancaster, W. C., & Henson, O. W.
Venue
Journal of Morphology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
223
Issue
1
Pages
99-107
ISSN
  • 0362-2525
  • 1097-4687
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphology of the abdominal wall in the bat, Pteronotus parnellii (Microchiroptera: Mormoopidae): Implications for biosonar vocalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmor.1052230109
The paper
Lancaster, W. C., & Henson, O. W. (1995). Morphology of the abdominal wall in the bat, Pteronotus parnellii (Microchiroptera: Mormoopidae): Implications for biosonar vocalization. Journal of Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052230109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.