The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Morphology of the abdominal wall in the bat, Pteronotus parnellii (Microchiroptera: Mormoopidae): Implications for biosonar vocalization
Abstract
We investigated the structure of the abdominal wall of Pteronotus parnellii and made comparisons with eight other species of Microchiroptera and one megachiropteran. Similar to other mammals, the abdominal wall of bats consists of the three flank muscles laterally and the m. rectus abdominis ventrally. In Microchiroptera, flank muscles are mostly confined to dorsal portions of the wall. The mm. transversus abdominis and obdominis and obliquus internus abdominis form the bulk of the wall; the m. obliquus externus is poorly developed. Ventrolaterally, a large portion of the wall is a dense, bilaminar aponeurosis, composed of collagen, elastin, and fibroblasts. The thicker, superficial lamina derives from the mm. obliquus internus and transversus abdominis. The deep lamina is a continuation of the transversalis fascia. Collagen fibers of the two fused laminae are oriented orthogonally, resulting in a resilient, composite fabric. Fascicles of the flank muscles are oriented along the margins of the aponeurosis so that their forces appear to be concentrated onto the aponeurosis. We suggest that this system is adapted for the regulation and generation of intra‐abdominal pressure. The abdominal wall of Pteropus, the one megachiropteran examined, lacks the derived aponeurosis and is similar to other mammals. We consider the abdominal wall of Microchiroptera to be analogous to the diaphragma, in that it functions in the regulation of pressure within body cavities and facilitates biosonar vocalization. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They reported that the rectus sheath adheres to the tendinous inscriptions at the caudal border of the pectoral muscles.”
From Tendinous Inscriptions of the Rectus Abdominis: A Comprehensive Review (2018) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Alexander R. McN., 1983, Animal Mechanics
- Alexander R. McN., 1988, Elastic Mechanisms in Animal Movement
- Chauveau A., 1873, The Comparative Anatomy of the Domesticated Animals
- 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90289-Y · DOI
- Getty R., 1975, Sisson and Grossman's The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals
- Griffin D. R., 1958, Listening in the Dark
- Humason G. L., 1972, Animal Tissue Techniques
- 10.1007/BF01002772 · DOI · Paper page
- Lancaster W. C. O. W.Henson Jr. andA. W.Keating(in press) Respiratory muscle activity in relation to vocalization in flying bats.J. Exp. Biol.
- Lessertisseur J., 1968, Traité de Zoologie: Anatomie, Systmatique, Biologie, 549
- 10.1098/rstl.1872.0008 · doi:10.1098/rstl.1872.0008
- 10.2535/ofaj1936.36.3-4_253 · doi:10.2535/ofaj1936.36.3-4_253
- Romer A. S., 1970, The Vertebrate Body
- Vaughan T. A., 1959, Functional morphology of three bats: Eumops, Myotis, Macrotis, Univ. Kansas Pubs. Mus. Nat. Hist., 12, 1
- Vaughan T. A., 1970, The Biology of Bats, 140
- Viidik A., 1980, The Biology of Collagen, 256
- Wainwright S. A., 1976, Mechanical Design in Organisms
- 10.1007/BF00398339 · doi:10.1007/bf00398339
- Winckler G., 1950, Contribution a l'étude des muscles larges de la paroi abdominale, Arch. Anat. Histol. Embryol., Strassbourg, 33, 159
Cited by
Tendinous Inscriptions of the Rectus Abdominis: A Comprehensive Review
Rai, R., Azih, L. C., Iwanaga, J., Loukas, M., Mortazavi, M., Oskouian, R. J., & Tubbs, R. S. (2018) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.3100 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancaster, W. C., & Henson, O. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Morphology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-107
- ISSN
- 0362-2525
- 1097-4687
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphology of the abdominal wall in the bat, Pteronotus parnellii (Microchiroptera: Mormoopidae): Implications for biosonar vocalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmor.1052230109
- The paper
- Lancaster, W. C., & Henson, O. W. (1995). Morphology of the abdominal wall in the bat, Pteronotus parnellii (Microchiroptera: Mormoopidae): Implications for biosonar vocalization. Journal of Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052230109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.