Patterns of morphospace occupation and mechanical performance in extant crocodilian skulls: a combined geometric morphometric and finite element modeling approach.
Open accessAbstract
Extant and fossil crocodilians have long been divided into taxonomic and/or ecological groups based on broad patterns of skull shape, particularly the relative length and width of the snout. However, these patterns have not been quantitatively analyzed in detail, and their biomechanical and functional implications are similarly understudied. Here, we use geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis to explore the patterns of variation in crocodilian skull morphology and the functional implications of those patterns. Our results indicate that skull shape variation in extant crocodiles is much more complex than previously recognized. Differences in snout length and width are the main components of shape variation, but these differences are correlated with changes in other regions of the skull. Additionally, there is considerable disparity within general classes such as longirostrine and brevirostrine forms. For example, Gavialis and Tomistoma occupy different parts of morphospace implying a significant difference in skull shape, despite the fact that both are traditionally considered longirostrine. Skull length and width also strongly influence the mechanical performance of the skull; long and narrow morphotypes (e.g., Tomistoma) experience the highest amount of stress during biting, whereas short and broad morphotypes (e.g., Caiman latirostris) experience the least amount of stress. Biomechanical stress and the hydrodynamic properties of the skull show a strong relation…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The conceptual model leaves rostral shape to be explained more fully by its relevance to the positioning and numbers of teeth, jaw hydrodynamics, and resistance to torsion or bending during prey capture and processing.
“Our conceptual model leaves rostral shape, which is obviously very important with regard to the crocodilian diversification, to be explained more fully by its relevance to the positioning and numbers of teeth, jaw hydrodynamics, and resistance to torsion or bending during prey capture and processing [11].”
From Insights into the Ecology and Evolutionary Success of Crocodilians Revealed through Bite-Force and Tooth-Pressure Experimentation (2012) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Erickson, G. M., Gignac, P. M., Steppan, S. J., Lappin, A. K., Vliet, K. A., Brueggen, J. D., Inouye, B. D., Kledzik, D., & Webb, G. J. W. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031781 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
“Our conceptual model leaves rostral shape, which is obviously very important with regard to the crocodilian diversification, to be explained more fully by its relevance to the positioning and numbers of teeth, jaw hydrodynamics, and resistance to torsion or bending during prey capture and processing [11].”
BackgroundHe, K. H., Bruse, J. L., Rodriguez-Florez, N., Dunaway, D., Jeelani, O., Schievano, S., & Borghi, A. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.231158 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pierce, S. E., Angielczyk, K. D., & Rayfield, E. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Field Museum of Natural History (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pierce, Stephanie E.
- Venue
- Journal of Morphology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-21
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 840-864
- ISSN
- 0362-2525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2057121140
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Morphology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- crocodilians, skull morphology, morphospace occupation, skull biomechanics, feeding ecology, Gavialis, Caiman latirostris, phylogenetic correlation, biogeography
- MeSH terms
- Alligators and Crocodiles, Animals, Feeding Behavior, Fossils, Phylogeny, Skull, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review