The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solid supports for microarray immunoassays
Abstract
Stimulated by the achievements of the first phase in genomics and the resulting need of assigning functions to the acquired sequence information, novel formats of immunoassays are being developed for high‐throughput multi‐analyte studies. In principle, they are similar in nature to the microarray assays already established at the level of nucleic acids. However, the biochemical diversity and the sheer number of proteins are such that an equivalent analysis is much more complex and thus difficult to accomplish. The wide range of protein concentration complicates matters further. Performing microarray immunoassays already represents a challenge at the level of preparing a working chip surface. Arrays have been produced on filter supports, in microtiter plate wells and on glass slides, the last two usually coated with one‐, two‐ or three‐dimensionally structured surface modifications. The usefulness and suitability of all these support media for the construction and application of antibody microarrays are reviewed in this manuscript in terms of the different kinds of immunoassay and the various detection procedures. Additionally, the employment of microarrays containing alternative sensor molecules is discussed in this context. The sensitivity of microspot immunoassays predicted by the current analyte theory is not yet a reality, indicating the extent of both the technology's potential and the size of the task still ahead. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Printing Proteins as Microarrays for High-Throughput Function Determination
MacBeath, G., & Schreiber, S. L. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5485.1760 · Cited by 2,767
Proteomics to study genes and genomes
Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015709 · Cited by 2,373
Global Analysis of Protein Activities Using Proteome Chips
Zhu, H., Bilgin, M., Bangham, R., Hall, D., Casamayor, A., Bertone, P., Lan, N., Jansen, R., Bidlingmaier, S., Houfek, T., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062191 · Cited by 1,884
Protein Nanoarrays Generated By Dip-Pen Nanolithography
Lee, K.-B., Park, S.-J., Mirkin, C. A., Smith, J. C., & Mrksich, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067172 · Cited by 1,146
(1996) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-342335-1.x5000-3 · Cited by 1,016
Paweletz, C. P., Charboneau, L., Bichsel, V. E., Simone, N. L., Chen, T., Gillespie, J. W., Emmert-Buck, M. R., Roth, M. J., Petricoin III, E. F., & Liotta, L. A. (2001) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204265 · Cited by 956
Haab, B. B., Dunham, M. J., & Brown, P. O. (2001) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2001-2-2-research0004 · Cited by 892
Protein microarrays and proteomics
MacBeath, G. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1037 · Cited by 846
Kenausis, G. L., Vörös, J., Elbert, D. L., Huang, N., Hofer, R., Ruiz-Taylor, L., Textor, M., Hubbell, J. A., & Spencer, N. D. (2000) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp993359m · Cited by 675
Autoantigen microarrays for multiplex characterization of autoantibody responses
Robinson, W. H., DiGennaro, C., Hueber, W., Haab, B. B., Kamachi, M., Dean, E. J., Fournel, S., Fong, D., Genovese, M. C., De Vegvar, H. E. N., et al. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0302-295 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Selective Covalent Protein Immobilization: Strategies and Applications
Wong, L. S., Khan, F., & Micklefield, J. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr8004668 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Kusnezow, W., & Hoheisel, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Recognition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 165-176
- ISSN
- 0952-3499 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1352
- OpenAlex
- W2041468111
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solid supports for microarray immunoassays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmr.625
- The paper
- Kusnezow, W., & Hoheisel, J. D. (2003). Solid supports for microarray immunoassays. Journal of Molecular Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.