The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting linear B‐cell epitopes using string kernels
Open accessAbstract
The identification and characterization of B‐cell epitopes play an important role in vaccine design, immunodiagnostic tests, and antibody production. Therefore, computational tools for reliably predicting linear B‐cell epitopes are highly desirable. We evaluated Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers trained utilizing five different kernel methods using fivefold cross‐validation on a homology‐reduced data set of 701 linear B‐cell epitopes, extracted from Bcipep database, and 701 non‐epitopes, randomly extracted from SwissProt sequences. Based on the results of our computational experiments, we propose BCPred, a novel method for predicting linear B‐cell epitopes using the subsequence kernel. We show that the predictive performance of BCPred (AUC = 0.758) outperforms 11 SVM‐based classifiers developed and evaluated in our experiments as well as our implementation of AAP (AUC = 0.7), a recently proposed method for predicting linear B‐cell epitopes using amino acid pair antigenicity. Furthermore, we compared BCPred with AAP and ABCPred, a method that uses recurrent neural networks, using two data sets of unique B‐cell epitopes that had been previously used to evaluate ABCPred. Analysis of the data sets used and the results of this comparison show that conclusions about the relative performance of different B‐cell epitope prediction methods drawn on the basis of experiments using data sets of unique B‐cell epitopes are likely to yield overly optimistic estimates of performance of evaluated methods. This argues for the use of carefully homology‐reduced data sets in comparing B‐cell epitope prediction methods to avoid misleading conclusions about how different methods compare to each other. Our homology‐reduced data set and implementations of BCPred as well as the APP method are publicly available through our web‐based server, BCPREDS, at: http://ailab.cs.iastate.edu/bcpreds/. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus
Li, W., Moore, M. J., Vasilieva, N., Sui, J., Wong, S. K., Berne, M. A., Somasundaran, M., Sullivan, J. L., Luzuriaga, K., Greenough, T. C., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02145 · Cited by 5,923
Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome
Drosten, C., Günther, S., Preiser, W., van der Werf, S., Brodt, H.-R., Becker, S., Rabenau, H., Panning, M., Kolesnikova, L., Fouchier, R. A. M., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030747 · Cited by 4,574
A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings
Friedman, M. (1940) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731944 · Cited by 2,785
Greenbaum, J. A., Andersen, P. H., Blythe, M., Bui, H., Cachau, R. E., Crowe, J., Davies, M., Kolaskar, A. S., Lund, O., Morrison, S., et al. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.815 · Cited by 244
Cited by
BepiPred-2.0: improving sequence-based B-cell epitope prediction using conformational epitopes
Jespersen, M. C., Peters, B., Nielsen, M., & Marcatili, P. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx346 · Cited by 1,746
Designing of interferon-gamma inducing MHC class-II binders
Dhanda, S. K., Vir, P., & Raghava, G. P. (2013) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-8-30 · Cited by 837
Fundamentals and Methods for T- and B-Cell Epitope Prediction
Sanchez-Trincado, J. L., Gomez-Perosanz, M., & Reche, P. A. (2017) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2017/2680160 · Cited by 674
Ali, M., Pandey, R. K., Khatoon, N., Narula, A., Mishra, A., & Prajapati, V. K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09199-w · Cited by 388
Improved Method for Linear B-Cell Epitope Prediction Using Antigen’s Primary Sequence
Singh, H., Ansari, H. R., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062216 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- EL‐Manzalawy, Y., Dobbs, D., & Honavar, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Recognition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 243-255
- ISSN
- 0952-3499 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1352
- OpenAlex
- W2035014358
- Cited by
- 753
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.