The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Routine quantitative analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces with MR imaging
Abstract
A computerized system for processing spin‐echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data was implemented to estimate whole brain (gray and white matter) and cerebrospinal fluid volumes and to display three‐dimensional surface reconstructions of specified tissue classes. The techniques were evaluated by assessing the radiometric variability of MR volume data and by comparing automated and manual procedures for measuring tissue volumes. Results showed (a) the homogeneity of the MR data and (b) that automated techniques were consistently superior to manual techniques. Both techniques, however, were affected by the complexity of the structure, with simpler structures (eg, the intracranial cavity) showing less variability and better spatial correlation of segmentation results between raters. Moreover, the automated techniques were completed for whole brain in a fraction of the time required to complete the equivalent segmentation manually. Additional evaluations included interrater reliability and an evaluation that included longitudinal measurement, in which one subject was imaged sequentially 24 times, with reliability computed from data collected by three raters over 1 year. Results showed good reliability for the automated segmentation procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Warfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072
New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization
Nyul, L. G., Udupa, J. K., & Zhang, X. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.836373 · Cited by 956
McCarley, R. W., Wible, C. G., Frumin, M., Hirayasu, Y., Levitt, J. J., Fischer, I. A., & Shenton, M. E. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00018-9 · Cited by 729
Self-citationMRI segmentation: Methods and applications
Clarke, L. P., Velthuizen, R. P., Camacho, M. A., Heine, J. J., Vaidyanathan, M., Hall, L. O., Thatcher, R. W., & Silbiger, M. L. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/0730-725x(94)00124-l · Cited by 695
White matter changes with normal aging.
Guttmann, C. R. G., Jolesz, F. A., Kikinis, R., Killiany, R. J., Moss, M. B., Sandor, T., & Albert, M. S. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.50.4.972 · Cited by 466
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kikinis, R., Shenton, M. E., Gerig, G., Martin, J., Anderson, M., Metcalf, D., Guttmann, C. R. G., McCarley, R. W., Jolesz, F. A., Lorensen, W., & Cline, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 619-629
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2032398883
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Routine quantitative analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces with MR imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.1880020603
- The paper
- Kikinis, R., Shenton, M. E., Gerig, G., Martin, J., Anderson, M., Metcalf, D., Guttmann, C. R. G., McCarley, R. W., Jolesz, F. A., Lorensen, W., & Cline, H. (1992). Routine quantitative analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces with MR imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880020603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.