Cited by 50Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Pulmonary ventilation imaging in asthma and cystic fibrosis using oxygen‐enhanced 3D radial ultrashort echo time MRI

Open access
Zha, Wei, Kruger, Stanley J., Johnson, Kevin M., Cadman, Robert V., Bell, Laura C., Liu, Fang, Hahn, Andrew D., Evans, Michael D. +2 more·2018·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Background: A previous study demonstrated the feasibility of using 3D radial ultrashort echo time (UTE) oxygen‐enhanced MRI (UTE OE‐MRI) for functional imaging of healthy human lungs. The repeatability of quantitative measures from UTE OE‐MRI needs to be established prior to its application in clinical research. Purpose: To evaluate repeatability of obstructive patterns in asthma and cystic fibrosis (CF) with UTE OE‐MRI with isotropic spatial resolution and full chest coverage. Study Type: Volunteer and patient repeatability. Population: Eighteen human subjects (five asthma, six CF, and seven normal subjects). Field Strength/Sequence: Respiratory‐gated free‐breathing 3D radial UTE (80 μs) sequence at 1.5T. Assessment: Two 3D radial UTE volumes were acquired sequentially under normoxic and hyperoxic conditions. A subset of subjects underwent repeat acquisitions on either the same day or ≤15 days apart. Asthma and CF subjects also underwent spirometry. A workflow including deformable registration and retrospective lung density correction was used to compute 3D isotropic percent signal enhancement (PSE) maps. Median PSE (MPSE) and ventilation defect percent (VDP) of the lung were measured from the PSE map. Statistical Tests: The relations between MPSE, VDP, and spirometric measures were assessed using Spearman correlations. The test–retest repeatability was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: Ventilation measures in normal subjects (MPSE = 8.0%, VDP = 3.3%) were significantly different from those in asthma (MPSE = 6.0%, P = 0.042; VDP = 21.7%, P = 0.018) and CF group (MPSE = 4.5%, P = 0.0006; VDP = 27.2%, P = 0.002). MPSE correlated significantly with forced expiratory lung volume in 1 second percent predicted (ρ = 0.72, P = 0.017). The ICC of the test–retest VDP and MPSE were both ≥0.90. In all subject groups, an anterior/posterior gradient was observed with higher MPSE and lower VDP in the posterior compared to anterior regions (P ≤ 0.0021 for all comparisons). Data Conclusion: 3D radial UTE OE‐MRI supports quantitative differentiation of diseased vs. healthy lungs using either whole lung VDP or MPSE with excellent test–retest repeatability. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1287–1297.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.25877

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zha, W., Kruger, S. J., Johnson, K. M., Cadman, R. V., Bell, L. C., Liu, F., Hahn, A. D., Evans, M. D., Nagle, S. K., & Fain, S. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Fain, Sean B.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-31
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
1287-1297
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2766261245
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NCATS (UL1TR000427)
  • NHLBI (U10 HL109168, ICTR)
  • Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
asthma, cystic fibrosis, ventilation imaging, oxygen-enhanced MRI, ultrashort echo time MRI, test-retest repeatability, hyperoxia, spirometry, deformable image registration, obstructive lung disease, anterior-posterior gradient, lung function assessment, 1.5 Tesla
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Adult, Asthma, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Lung, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Respiration, Pulmonary Ventilation, Respiratory Function Tests, Spirometry, Reproducibility of Results, Hyperoxia, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Young Adult, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review