The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simultaneous detection of fourteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by two multiplex reverse transcription nested‐PCR assays
Open accessAbstract
There is a need for rapid, sensitive, and accurate diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections in children, elderly, and immunocompromised patients, who are susceptible to serious complications. The multiplex RT‐nested PCR assay has been used widely for simultaneous detection of non‐related viruses involved in infectious diseases because of its high specificity and sensitivity. A new multiplex RT‐PCR assay is described in this report. This approach includes nested primer sets targeted to conserve regions of human parainfluenza virus haemagglutinin, human coronavirus spike protein, and human enterovirus and rhinovirus polyprotein genes. It permits rapid, sensitive, and simultaneous detection and typing of the four types of parainfluenza viruses (1, 2, 3, 4AB), human coronavirus 229E and OC43, and the generic detection of enteroviruses and rhinoviruses. The testing of 201 clinical specimens with this multiplex assay along with other one formerly described by our group to simultaneously detect and type the influenza viruses, respiratory syncytial viruses, and a generic detection of all serotypes of adenovirus, covers the detection of most viruses causing respiratory infectious disease in humans. The results obtained were compared with conventional viral culture, immunofluorescence assay, and a third multiplex RT‐PCR assay for all human parainfluenza viruses types described previously. In conclusion, both multiplex RT‐PCR assays provide a system capable of detecting and identifying simultaneously 14 different respiratory viruses in clinical specimens with high sensitivity and specificity, being useful for routine diagnosis and survey of these viruses within the population. J. Med. Virol. 72:484–495, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Community study of role of viral infections in exacerbations of asthma in 9–11 year old children
Johnston, S. L., Pattemore, P. K., Sanderson, G., Smith, S., Lampe, F., Josephs, L., Symington, P., Toole, S. O., Myint, S. H., Tyrrell, D. A. J., et al. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6989.1225 · Cited by 1,991
Respiratory viruses and exacerbations of asthma in adults
Nicholson, K. G., Kent, J., & Ireland, D. C. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6910.982 · Cited by 1,127
Frequency and natural history of rhinovirus infections in adults during autumn
Arruda, E., Pitkäranta, A., Witek, T. J., Doyle, C. A., & Hayden, F. G. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.35.11.2864-2868.1997 · Cited by 346
Cited by
Lamson, D., Renwick, N., Kapoor, V., Liu, Z., Palacios, G., Ju, J., Dean, A., St. George, K., Briese, T., & Ian Lipkin, W. (2006) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/508551 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Coiras, M. T., Aguilar, J. C., García, M. L., Casas, I., & Pérez‐Breña, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Virology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01-09
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 484-495
- ISSN
- 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9071
- OpenAlex
- W2053048205
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneous detection of fourteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by two multiplex reverse transcription nested‐PCR assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmv.20008
- The paper
- Coiras, M. T., Aguilar, J. C., García, M. L., Casas, I., & Pérez‐Breña, P. (2004). Simultaneous detection of fourteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by two multiplex reverse transcription nested‐PCR assays. Journal of Medical Virology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.