The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Norwalk virus: How infectious is it?
Abstract
Noroviruses are major agents of viral gastroenteritis worldwide. The infectivity of Norwalk virus, the prototype norovirus, has been studied in susceptible human volunteers. A new variant of the hit theory model of microbial infection was developed to estimate the variation in Norwalk virus infectivity, as well as the degree of virus aggregation, consistent with independent (electron microscopic) observations. Explicit modeling of viral aggregation allows us to express virus infectivity per single infectious unit (particle). Comparison of a primary and a secondary inoculum showed that passage through a human host does not change Norwalk virus infectivity. We estimate the average probability of infection for a single Norwalk virus particle to be close to 0.5, exceeding that reported for any other virus studied to date. Infected subjects had a dose‐dependent probability of becoming ill, ranging from 0.1 (at a dose of 10 3 NV genomes) to 0.7 (at 10 8 virus genomes). A norovirus dose response model is important for understanding its transmission and essential for development of a quantitative risk model. Norwalk virus is a valuable model system to study virulence because genetic factors are known for both complete and partial protection; the latter can be quantitatively described as heterogeneity in dose response models. J. Med. Virol. 80:1468–1476, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bányai, K., Estes, M. K., Martella, V., & Parashar, U. D. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31128-0 · Cited by 445
Norovirus outbreak caused by a new septic system in a dolomite aquifer
Borchardt, M. A., Bradbury, K. R., Alexander, E. C., Kolberg, R. J., Alexander, S. C., Archer, J. R., Braatz, L. A., Forest, B. M., Green, J. A., & Spencer, S. K. (2011) · Groundwater · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00686.x · Cited by 115
Nyström, K., Le Gall-Reculé, G., Grassi, P., Abrantes, J., Ruvoën-Clouet, N., Le Moullac-Vaidye, B., Lopes, A. M., Esteves, P. J., Strive, T., Marchandeau, S., et al. (2011) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002188 · Cited by 114
Self-citationDisease burden due to gastrointestinal pathogens in a wastewater system in Kampala, Uganda
Fuhrimann, S., Winkler, M. S., Stalder, M., Niwagaba, C. B., Babu, M., Kabatereine, N. B., Halage, A. A., Utzinger, J., Cissé, G., & Nauta, M. (2016) · Microbial Risk Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.mran.2016.11.003 · Cited by 78
A farm to fork risk assessment for the use of wastewater in Agriculture in Accra, Ghana
Antwi-Agyei, P., Cairncross, S., Peasey, A., Price, V., Bruce, J., Baker, K., Moe, C., Ampofo, J., Armah, G., & Ensink, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142346 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Teunis, P. F. M., Moe, C. L., Liu, P., E. Miller, S., Lindesmith, L., Baric, R. S., Le Pendu, J., & Calderon, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Virology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-06-12
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1468-1476
- ISSN
- 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9071
- OpenAlex
- W2052994688
- Cited by
- 1,249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Norwalk virus: How infectious is it? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmv.21237
- The paper
- Teunis, P. F. M., Moe, C. L., Liu, P., E. Miller, S., Lindesmith, L., Baric, R. S., Le Pendu, J., & Calderon, R. L. (2008). Norwalk virus: How infectious is it? Journal of Medical Virology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.21237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.