COVID-19: What type of cytokine storm are we dealing with?
Open accessAbstract
We read with great interest the comment published by Andrianopoulos et al1 in which the authors advocate for cautious use of tocilizumab in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients. Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor that has immunosuppressive properties. Whereas accumulating results from uncontrolled trials present tocilizumab as an effective agent blocker of disease progression, some contrasting studies also progressively appear in COVID-19 literature.2-5 This muddies the waters and makes the situation more confused. Therefore, we would like to reinforce the purpose of Andrianopoulos et al1 by commenting on the cytokine storm proposed in COVID-19 as it constituted the rationale for most tocilizumab trials. To this end, we referred to recent articles regarding the two main clinical conditions traditionally linked with the term “cytokine storm,” that is, septic shock and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after CAR-T cells infusion to compare mean/median plasmatic IL-6 levels in these contexts and in COVID-19 patients. Results are presented in Figure 1. The majority of median COVID-19 IL-6 values are far lower than those seen in septic shock or CRS (P < .0002, analysis of variance). In agreement, a recent meta-analysis of IL-6 values in 1426 COVID-19 patients reported mean IL-6 values at 57 pg/mL in severe patients and 17 pg/mL in less severe patients.6 Although clearly elevated above normal range (generally <10 pg/mL depending on kits providers); those values remain far lower from those seen in usual clinical contexts associated with cytokine storms. Actually, despite rare extreme values, these mean concentrations are similar to those described in various inflammatory diseases (chronic infections, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis) which are not usually characterized or defined by the occurrence of cytokine storm.7 Of note, by recent international definition, severe COVID-19 can be classified as a viral sepsis,8 that is, organ failure (acute respiratory distress syndrome) induced by a dysregulated response to an infection (SARS-CoV-2). In sepsis, on a general basis, anti-inflammatory strategies did not show any significant efficacy despite numerous clinical trials.9 With that said, one study identified a protective effect of immunomodulatory treatment in a subgroup of septic patients when stratified based on circulating IL-6 values. In this study, the threshold to highlight this effect was 1000 pg/mL.10 In conclusion, it is unquestionable that COVID-19 presents with inflammatory characteristics. As such, there is likely a room for tocilizumab (or other anti-inflammatory drugs) in subgroups of patients to avoid progression toward uncontrolled inflammation. That given, we suggest that such treatment should be envisaged in a more individualized manner and on short period not to amplify marked immunosuppression observed in intensive care unit COVID-19 patients.11, 12 We thus agree with Andrianopoulos et al1 to cautiously consider tocilizumab depending on disease chronology, occurrence of ARDS, IL-6 level stratification and most importantly, the depth of lymphopenia. The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IL-6 levels in COVID-19 are considerably lower than in septic shock or CRS from other causes.
“observed elevated IL-6 levels are considerably lower than e.g., in septic shock or CRS due to other causes”
From COVID-19 and the human innate immune system (2021) · cites this paper as Monneret et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Monneret, G., Benlyamani, I., Gossez, M., Bermejo‐Martin, J. F., Martín‐Fernandez, M., Sesques, P., Wallet, F., & Venet, F.
- Affiliations
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
- Biomedical research Department Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca Salamanca Spain
- Corresponding author
- Monneret, Guillaume
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Virology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-07-27
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-198
- ISSN
- 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9071
- PMC
- PMC7405026
- OpenAlex
- W3042719364
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Virology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, cytokine storm, interleukin-6, tocilizumab, septic shock, cytokine release syndrome, viral sepsis, immunomodulatory therapy, SARS-CoV-2, anti-inflammatory therapy, acute respiratory distress syndrome, organ failure, inflammatory diseases, rheumatoid arthritis
- MeSH terms
- Cytokine Release Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Humans, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review