The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Induction of bone marrow stromal cells to neurons: Differentiation, transdifferentiation, or artifact?
Abstract
Differentiation of stem cells toward a neuronal lineage normally involves a gradually progressive restriction in developmental potential and is regulated by a diverse set of specific and temporally precise genetic events. However, recent studies have indicated that both rodent and human bone marrow stromal cells (MSCs) can be rapidly (within minutes to hours) induced to differentiate into neurons in vitro by relatively simple chemical means (using β‐mercaptoethanol [BME] or dimethylsulfoxide [DMSO] and butylated hydroxyanisol [BHA]; Woodbury et al. [ 2000] J. Neurosci. Res. 61:364–370). The ability to transdifferentiate an easily accessible cell source into neurons could have substantial potential for promoting neural repair. We therefore explored the potential of simple chemical methods to transdifferentiate other cell types, including primary rat fibroblasts, primary human keratinocytes, HEK293 cells, rat PC‐12 cells, and as positive control rat bone marrow stromal (BMS) cells. Surprisingly, all cells except for keratinocytes adopted at least partial “neuron‐like” pyramidal cell morphology with fine‐cellular extensions resembling neurites upon stimulation with BME or DMSO/BHA. However, time‐lapse microscopy indicated that the chemical exposure of MSCs did not result in new neurite growth but rather cellular shrinkage, with retraction of the majority of existing cell extensions, leaving only few, fine neurite‐like processes. To determine whether the chemically induced transdifferentiation resulted from simple cellular toxicity, MSCs were exposed to various stressors, including detergents, high‐molarity sodium chloride, and extremes of pH. In all cases, cellular shrinkage and adoption of pseudoneuronal morphology were observed. Concomitantly with cellular shrinkage, apparent increases in immunolabeling for the neuronal markers NSE and NeuN were detected in the cell soma that could not be confirmed by RT‐PCR. Furthermore, blockade of protein synthesis with cycloheximide did not prevent cells from adopting “neuron‐like” morphology after chemical induction. Thus, morphological changes and increases in immunolabeling for certain cellular markers upon “chemical induction” of MSCs are likely the result of cellular toxicity, cell shrinkage, and changes in the cytoskeleton and do not represent regulated steps in a complicated cellular differentiation process. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow
Jiang, Y., Jahagirdar, B. N., Reinhardt, R. L., Schwartz, R. E., Keene, C. D., Ortiz-Gonzalez, X. R., Reyes, M., Lenvik, T., Lund, T., Blackstad, M., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00870 · Cited by 5,518
RetractedPurification and ex vivo expansion of postnatal human marrow mesodermal progenitor cells
Reyes, M., Lund, T., Lenvik, T., Aguiar, D., Koodie, L., & Verfaillie, C. M. (2001) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v98.9.2615 · Cited by 1,185
RetractedGreene, L. A., & Tischler, A. S. (1976) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.73.7.2424 · Cited by 5,553
Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons
Woodbury, D., Schwarz, E. J., Prockop, D. J., & Black, I. B. (2000) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/1097-4547(20000815)61:4<364::aid-jnr2>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 2,434
Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells: Nature, Biology, and Potential Applications
Bianco, P., Riminucci, M., Gronthos, S., & Robey, P. G. (2001) · STEM CELLS · doi:10.1634/stemcells.19-3-180 · Cited by 1,939
Turning Blood into Brain: Cells Bearing Neuronal Antigens Generated in Vivo from Bone Marrow
Mezey, E., Chandross, K. J., Harta, G., Maki, R. A., & McKercher, S. R. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5497.1779 · Cited by 1,822
From Marrow to Brain: Expression of Neuronal Phenotypes in Adult Mice
Brazelton, T. R., Rossi, F. M. V., Keshet, G. I., & Blau, H. M. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5497.1775 · Cited by 1,676
Kopen, G. C., Prockop, D. J., & Phinney, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.19.10711 · Cited by 1,636
Fusion of bone-marrow-derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes
Alvarez-Dolado, M., Pardal, R., Garcia-Verdugo, J. M., Fike, J. R., Lee, H. O., Pfeffer, K., Lois, C., Morrison, S. J., & Alvarez-Buylla, A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02069 · Cited by 1,617
Adult Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Differentiate into Neural Cells in Vitro
Sanchez-Ramos, J., Song, S., Cardozo-Pelaez, F., Hazzi, C., Stedeford, T., Willing, A., Freeman, T. B., Saporta, S., Janssen, W., Patel, N., et al. (2000) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1006/exnr.2000.7389 · Cited by 1,562
Cited by
Vercelli, A., Mereuta, O. M., Garbossa, D., Muraca, G., Mareschi, K., Rustichelli, D., Ferrero, I., Mazzini, L., Madon, E., & Fagioli, F. (2008) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2008.05.016 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, P., Blesch, A., & Tuszynski, M. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-20
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-191
- ISSN
- 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4547
- OpenAlex
- W2115789073
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of bone marrow stromal cells to neurons: Differentiation, transdifferentiation, or artifact? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jnr.20148
- The paper
- Lu, P., Blesch, A., & Tuszynski, M. H. (2004). Induction of bone marrow stromal cells to neurons: Differentiation, transdifferentiation, or artifact? Journal of Neuroscience Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.