Characterization of the neuronal marker NeuN as a multiply phosphorylated antigen with discrete subcellular localization
Abstract
NeuN (neuronal nuclei) is an antigen used widely in research and diagnostics to identify postmitotic neurons. The present study aims at an initial understanding of the molecular nature and functional significance of this as yet ill‐defined antigen. Using isoelectric focusing, both the 46‐ and 48‐kDa isoforms of NeuN can be separated in multiple spots spanning a pH range of 8–10.5, suggesting that they might be phosphorylated. Enzymatic dephosphorylation abolishes NeuN immunoreactivity, confirming that NeuN is indeed a phosphoprotein, and establishing that binding of the defining antibody depends on its state of phosphorylation. Combined biochemical and immunohistochemical analysis show that both the 46‐ and the 48‐kDa NeuN isoforms can be localized to the cell nucleus as well as in the neuronal cytoplasm. Their relative concentration in these compartments is distinct, however, with the 48‐kDa isoform being the predominant isoform in the cytoplasm. Within the nucleus, NeuN is found preferentially in areas of low chromatin density and virtually excluded from areas containing densely packed DNA. The present identification of multiple differentially phosphorylated isoforms of NeuN, together with recent reports on the dependence of NeuN immunoreactivity levels on a variety of physiologic or pathologic signals, suggests a previously unappreciated level of complexity in the regulation of this enigmatic, neuron‐specific antigen. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NeuN and BF-1 are markers for neuronal viability.
“To determine whether there was any effect on neuronal viability, we examined two additional markers by western blot, NeuN36 and BF-137.”
From A divalent siRNA chemical scaffold for potent and sustained modulation of gene expression throughout the central nervous system (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 222
- Authors
- Lind, D., Franken, S., Kappler, J., Jankowski, J., & Schilling, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schilling, Karl
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-16
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-302
- ISSN
- 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4547
- OpenAlex
- W2033682969
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- NeuN, phosphorylation, phosphoproteins, protein isoforms, subcellular localization, nuclear localization, cytoplasmic localization, chromatin density, dephosphorylation, postmitotic neurons
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antigens, Brain, Cell Compartmentation, Cell Nucleus, Cells, Cultured, Cytoplasm, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Biomarkers, Protein Isoforms, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review