Cited by 222Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Characterization of the neuronal marker NeuN as a multiply phosphorylated antigen with discrete subcellular localization

Lind, Daniela, Franken, Sebastian, Kappler, Joachim, Jankowski, Jakob, Schilling, Karl·2005·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

NeuN (neuronal nuclei) is an antigen used widely in research and diagnostics to identify postmitotic neurons. The present study aims at an initial understanding of the molecular nature and functional significance of this as yet ill‐defined antigen. Using isoelectric focusing, both the 46‐ and 48‐kDa isoforms of NeuN can be separated in multiple spots spanning a pH range of 8–10.5, suggesting that they might be phosphorylated. Enzymatic dephosphorylation abolishes NeuN immunoreactivity, confirming that NeuN is indeed a phosphoprotein, and establishing that binding of the defining antibody depends on its state of phosphorylation. Combined biochemical and immunohistochemical analysis show that both the 46‐ and the 48‐kDa NeuN isoforms can be localized to the cell nucleus as well as in the neuronal cytoplasm. Their relative concentration in these compartments is distinct, however, with the 48‐kDa isoform being the predominant isoform in the cytoplasm. Within the nucleus, NeuN is found preferentially in areas of low chromatin density and virtually excluded from areas containing densely packed DNA. The present identification of multiple differentially phosphorylated isoforms of NeuN, together with recent reports on the dependence of NeuN immunoreactivity levels on a variety of physiologic or pathologic signals, suggests a previously unappreciated level of complexity in the regulation of this enigmatic, neuron‐specific antigen. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.20354

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 222

Authors
Lind, D., Franken, S., Kappler, J., Jankowski, J., & Schilling, K.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Schilling, Karl
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12-16
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
295-302
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2033682969
Cited by
222
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
NeuN, phosphorylation, phosphoproteins, protein isoforms, subcellular localization, nuclear localization, cytoplasmic localization, chromatin density, dephosphorylation, postmitotic neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Brain, Cell Compartmentation, Cell Nucleus, Cells, Cultured, Cytoplasm, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Biomarkers, Protein Isoforms, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review