Cited by 78Estrogen and related hormone effectsPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsIon Channels and Receptors

Estrogen receptor-α mediates estradiol attenuation of ATP-induced Ca2+ signaling in mouse dorsal root ganglion neurons

Chaban, Victor V., Micevych, Paul E·2005·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

A mechanism underlying gender-related differences in pain perception may be estrogen modulation of nociceptive signaling in the peripheral nervous system. In rat, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons express estrogen receptors (ERs) and estrogen rapidly attenuates ATP-induced Ca2+ signaling. To determine which estrogen receptor mediates rapid actions of estrogen, we showed ERalpha and ERbeta expression in DRG neurons from wild-type (WT) female mice by RT-PCR. To study whether ERalpha or ERbeta mediates this response, we compared estradiol action mediating Ca2+ signaling in DRG neurons from WT, ERalpha knockout (ERalphaKO), and ERbetaKO mice in vitro. ATP, an algesic agent, induced [Ca2+]i transients in 48% of small DRG neurons from WT mice. 17beta-Estradiol (E2) inhibited ATP-induced intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) with an IC50 of 27 nM. The effect of E2 was rapid (5-min exposure) and stereo specific; 17alpha-estradiol had no effect. E2 action was blocked by the ER antagonist ICI 182,780 (1 microM) in WT mouse. Estradiol coupled to bovine serum albumin (E-6-BSA), which does not penetrate the plasma membrane, had the same effect as E2 did, suggesting that a membrane-associated ER mediated the response. In DRG neurons from ERbetaKO mice, E2 attenuated the ATP-induced [Ca2+]i flux as it did in WT mice, but in DRG neurons from ERalphaKO mice, E2 failed to inhibit the ATP-induced [Ca2+]i increase. These results show that mouse DRG neurons express ERs and the rapid attenuation of ATP-induced [Ca2+]i signaling is mediated by membrane-associated ERalpha.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.20524

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 78

Authors
Chaban, V. V., & Micevych, P. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Chaban, Victor V.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
31-37
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W1983078327
Cited by
78
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH057759, MH57759)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 13185, R01DA013185)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD42635, R01HD042635)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta, estradiol, dorsal root ganglion neurons, calcium transients, nociception, sex differences in pain, ER knockout mice, fulvestrant
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Estradiol, Female, Ganglia, Spinal, Neurons, Sex Factors, Pain Threshold, Mice, Knockout, Statistics, Nonparametric, Calcium Signaling, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Estrogen Receptor beta, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review