Morphometric analysis of oligodendrocytes in the adult mouse frontal cortex
Abstract
Oligodendrocytes (OLs), the myelinating cells of the central nervous system, have specialized morphologies that subserve their function. Numerous qualitative studies suggest that OLs in different brain regions can differ in their morphological characteristics, including number of branches and internodes, internode length, etc. However, progress in identifying and characterizing the diverse types of OLs and their distribution in the brain has been made difficult by several technical constraints. Here we report a new strategy to analyze OL morphology with a high degree of quantitative power and throughput. We used confocal microscopy and three-dimensional cell tracing software to study OLs in the frontal cortex of mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) under the control of the proteolipid protein (Plp) gene promoter. Three-dimensional reconstructions were then used to analyze and quantify cell morphology, including total process length, total process surface area, total internode length, number of primary processes, number of branch points, and number of internodes. In addition, these reconstructions were subjected to Sholl analysis, which allows for the quantitative measure of OL arbor complexity. By using this approach, we identified and characterized a previously undescribed population of small OLs with a compact but complex morphology that includes numerous branching processes and a large number of short internodes. Our data suggest that other populations of OLs remain to be identified and characterized and that the tools we have developed could help in the process of characterizing them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Internode length and the number of internodes elaborated per OL vary greatly between CNS regions.
“Internode length and the number of internodes elaborated per OL vary greatly between CNS regions (Butt et al., 1994; Murtie et al., 2007; Chong et al., 2012)”
From Oligodendrocyte Dynamics in the Healthy Adult CNS: Evidence for Myelin Remodeling (2013) · cites this paper as Murtie et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Murtie, J. C., Macklin, W. B., & Corfas, G.
- Affiliations
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Corfas, Gabriel
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-10
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2080-2086
- ISSN
- 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4547
- OpenAlex
- W2119201197
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS35884, R01NS025304, R01NS035884)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- oligodendrocytes, oligodendrocyte morphology, frontal cortex, internode length, Sholl analysis, myelination, mouse brain
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dendrites, Fluorescent Dyes, Frontal Lobe, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Oligodendroglia, Microscopy, Confocal, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review