Cited by 152Cell death mechanisms and regulationProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Inhibition of the Rho/ROCK pathway reduces apoptosis during transplantation of embryonic stem cell‐derived neural precursors

Open access
Koyanagi, Masaomi, Takahashi, Jun, Arakawa, Yoshiki, Doi, Daisuke, Fukuda, Hitoshi, Hayashi, Hideki, Narumiya, Shuh, Hashimoto, Nobuo·2008·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

Rho‐GTPase has been implicated in the apoptosis of many cell types, including neurons, but the mechanism by which it acts is not fully understood. Here, we investigate the roles of Rho and ROCK in apoptosis during transplantation of embryonic stem cell‐derived neural precursor cells. We find that dissociation of neural precursors activates Rho and induces apoptosis. Treatment with the Rho inhibitor C3 exoenzyme and/or the ROCK inhibitor Y‐27632 decreases the amount of dissociation‐induced apoptosis (anoikis) by 20–30%. Membrane blebbing, which is an early morphological sign of apoptosis; cleavage of caspase‐3; and release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria are also reduced by ROCK inhibition. These results suggest that dissociation of neural precursor cells elicits an intrinsic pathway of cell death that is at least partially mediated through the Rho/ROCK pathway. Moreover, in an animal transplantation model, inhibition of Rho and/or ROCK suppresses acute apoptosis of grafted cells. After transplantation, tumor necrosis factor‐α and pro‐nerve growth factor are strongly expressed around the graft. ROCK inhibition also suppresses apoptosis enhanced by these inflammatory cytokines. Taken together, these results indicate that inhibition of Rho/ROCK signaling may improve survival of grafted cells in cell replacement therapy. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.21502

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RhoA signalling might potentially contribute to cell death, because it can promote apoptosis in low-adhesion environments by increasing cell contractility.

    “RhoA signalling might also potentially contribute to cell death, because it can promote apoptosis in low-adhesion environments by increasing cell contractility, explaining why ROCK inhibitors are a standard component of media for stem cells and organoid isolation and maintenance in culture 77-81 .”

    From Taxane-induced conformational changes in the microtubule lattice activate GEF-H1-dependent RhoA signalling (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

    The paper summary (page not specified) reports that dispersing mouse embryonic stem cell–derived neural precursors activated Rho and led to cell death, which Rho and ROCK inhibitors reduced. The examination summary likewise links loss of cell adhesion to Rho/ROCK activity and apoptosis. Neither passage establishes increased cell contractility as the mechanism, or says ROCK inhibitors are standard components of stem-cell and organoid culture media. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 152

Authors
Koyanagi, M., Takahashi, J., Arakawa, Y., Doi, D., Fukuda, H., Hayashi, H., Narumiya, S., & Hashimoto, N.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Takahashi, Jun
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-07
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
270-280
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2095013780
Cited by
152
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
Rho/ROCK signaling, apoptosis, anoikis, C3 exoenzyme, Y-27632, caspase-3, cytochrome c release, membrane blebbing, TNF-α, nerve growth factor, graft survival, cell replacement therapy, Rho GTPases
MeSH terms
Animals, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, Stem Cell Transplantation, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review