Cited by 110Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Sex differences in social cognition: the case of face processing

Open access
Proverbio, Alice Mado·2017·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that women show a greater interest for social information and empathic attitude than men. This article reviews studies on sex differences in the brain, with particular reference to how males and females process faces and facial expressions, social interactions, pain of others, infant faces, faces in things (pareidolia phenomenon), opposite-sex faces, humans vs. landscapes, incongruent behavior, motor actions, biological motion, erotic pictures, and emotional information. Sex differences in oxytocin-based attachment response and emotional memory are also mentioned. In addition, we investigated how 400 different human faces were evaluated for arousal and valence dimensions by a group of healthy male and female University students. Stimuli were carefully balanced for sensory and perceptual characteristics, age, facial expression, and sex. As a whole, women judged all human faces as more positive and more arousing than men. Furthermore, they showed a preference for the faces of children and the elderly in the arousal evaluation. Regardless of face aesthetics, age, or facial expression, women rated human faces higher than men. The preference for opposite- vs. same-sex faces strongly interacted with facial age. Overall, both women and men exhibited differences in facial processing that could be interpreted in the light of evolutionary psychobiology. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.23817

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 110

Authors
Proverbio, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Corresponding author
Proverbio, Alice Mado
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-07
Volume
95
Issue
1-2
Pages
222-234
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2552390344
Cited by
110
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Milano-Bicocca (13974 2015-ATE-0052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
sex differences, social cognition, face processing, facial expressions, empathy, pareidolia, biological motion, emotional memory, oxytocin, attachment, infant faces
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxytocin, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review