The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neuroplasticity in the olfactory system: Differential effects of central and peripheral lesions of the primary olfactory pathway on the expression of B‐50/GAP43 and the olfactory marker protein
Open accessAbstract
The regeneration of the olfactory neuroepithelium following olfactory bulbectomy or peripheral deafferentation was studied with mRNA probes and antibodies for B‐50/GAP43 and for olfactory marker protein (OMP). Two stages in the regeneration of the olfactory epithelium could be discerned with these reagents. The first stage occurs following either peripheral deafferentation of the olfactory epithelium with Triton X‐100 (TX‐100) or after bulbectomy and is characterized by the formation of a large population of immature olfactory receptor neurons. These newly formed neurons express B‐50/GAP43, a phosphoprotein related to neuronal growth and plasticity. During the second stage of the regeneration process the newly formed olfactory neurons mature, as evidenced by a decrease in their expression of B‐50/GAP43 and an increase in the expression of OMP. This stage is only manifested if the developing neurons have access to the target olfactory bulb. Formation of a full complement of OMP‐expressing neurons occurs only after peripheral lesion with TX‐100. In contrast, following bulbectomy the reconstituted olfactory epithelium lacks its normal target and is compromised in its ability to recover from nerve damage, as evidenced by the presence of a large number of B‐50/GAP43‐expressing neurons up to 3 months after the lesion and its failure to establish a full complement of OMP‐expressing neurons. These results demonstrate that the olfactory epithelium is capable of replacing its sensory neurons independently of the presence of its target, the olfactory bulb. However, the differential patterns of expression of B‐50/GAP43 and OMP at long times after peripheral lesion with TX‐100 or bulbectomy illustrate the profound effect the olfactory bulb has on neuronal maturation in reconstituted olfactory neuroepithelium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Topographic organization of sensory projections to the olfactory bulb
Vassar, R., Chao, S. K., Sitcheran, R., Nun˜ez, J. M., Vosshall, L. B., & Axel, R. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90029-9 · Cited by 1,295
Isolation, Characterization, and use of Stem Cells from the CNS
Gage, F. H., Ray, J., & Fisher, L. J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001111 · Cited by 829
Neural regeneration and the peripheral olfactory system
Schwob, J. E. (2002) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.10047 · Cited by 511
Olfactory ensheathing glia: properties and function
Ramón-Cueto, A., & Avila, J. (1998) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(97)00463-2 · Cited by 377
Schwob, J., Szumowski, K., & Stasky, A. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-10-03896.1992 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Verhaagen, J., Oestreicher, A. B., Grillo, M., Khew‐Goodall, Y. ‐., Gispen, W. H., & Margolis, F. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-44
- ISSN
- 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4547
- OpenAlex
- W1993609830
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuroplasticity in the olfactory system: Differential effects of central and peripheral lesions of the primary olfactory pathway on the expression of B‐50/GAP43 and the olfactory marker protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jnr.490260105
- The paper
- Verhaagen, J., Oestreicher, A. B., Grillo, M., Khew‐Goodall, Y. ‐., Gispen, W. H., & Margolis, F. L. (1990). Neuroplasticity in the olfactory system: Differential effects of central and peripheral lesions of the primary olfactory pathway on the expression of B‐50/GAP43 and the olfactory marker protein. Journal of Neuroscience Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.490260105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.