Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Function and evolution in the NGF family and its receptors

Ebendal, T.·1992·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

The gene family of neurotrophins includes nerve growth factor (NGF), brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin‐3 (NT‐3), and neurotrophin‐4 (NT‐4). Recently, neurotrophin‐5 (NT‐5), a possible mammalian homologue to NT‐4 described in the frog Xenopus, has been cloned in man and rat. The neurotrophins stimulate survival and differentiation of a range of target neurons by binding to cell surface receptors. The structure of NGF has recently been clarified from crystallographic data. The similarities between the different neurotrophins are substantial with the variable regions, giving specificity to each of the family members, being localized to some exposed loop regions. Low‐affinity binding (K d of 10−9 M) of all tested neurotrophins is mediated via a 75 K glycoprotein (LNGFR) that has been cloned and characterized. A 140 K tyrosine protein kinase encoded by the proto‐oncogene trk has been found to bind NGF with high affinity (K d of 10−11 M) and to evoke the cellular neurotrophic responses. In addition, a protein encoded by the trk‐related gene trk B has been shown to bind BDNF. Recently, a third member of the trk family, trk C, has been cloned and demonstrated to function as a high‐affinity receptor for NT‐3. The expression of trk and LNGFR mRNA are co‐localized in the rat brain to the medial septal nucleus and the nucleus of Broca's diagonal band containing the NGF‐responsive magnocellular cholinergic neurons projecting to hippocampus and cerebral cortex. In sharp contrast, the pattern of expression of trk B is widely spread in many areas of the cortex as well as lateral septum. The trk B protein might serve general functions in large areas of the cortex. Site‐directed mutagenesis and expression of recombinant chimaeric neurotrophin proteins have made it possible to localize a likely region for the interaction between NGF and the LNGFR. This region could be altered, resulting in the total loss of LNGFR binding by the mutant NGF protein without affecting the binding to the trk receptor which was sufficient for the full biological activity. Cladistic analysis of likely phylogenies within the neurotrophins shows BDNF and NT‐4 to be most closely related whereas NGF may be the sister group to NT‐3, BDNF, and NT‐4. Neurotrophins offer obvious clinical possibilities for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. © 1992 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.490320402

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Ebendal, T.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-08
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
461-470
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W2042912378
Cited by
349
References
5
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Function and evolution in the NGF family and its receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jnr.490320402
The paper
Ebendal, T. (1992). Function and evolution in the NGF family and its receptors. Journal of Neuroscience Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.490320402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.