Long‐term hippocampal slices: A model system for investigating synaptic mechanisms and pathologic processes
Abstract
Organotypic cultures provide a unique strategy with which to examine many aspects of brain physiology and pathology. Long‐term slice cultures from the hippocampus, a region involved in memory encoding and one that exhibits early degeneration in Alzheimer's disease and ischemia, are particularly valuable in this regard due to their expression of synaptic plasticity mechanisms (e.g., long‐term potentiation) and responsiveness to pathological insults (e.g., excitotoxicity). Long‐term slices can be prepared from hippocampi at the second or third postnatal week of development and thus incorporate a number of relatively mature features; further signs of maturation and the preservation of adult‐like characteristics occur over succeeding weeks. The stability of the cultured slice renders it an appropriate model for studying (1) prolonged regulation/stabilization events linked to synaptogenesis and certain forms of plasticity, (2) temporal patterns of cellular atrophy associated with pathogenic conditions such as ischemia and epilepsia, and (3) slow processes associated with aging and agerelated pathologies. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brain slice culture (BSC) is an in vitro model that represents the architecture of the brain.
“Brain slice culture (BSC) is an in vitro model in the field of neurosciences that represents the architecture of the brain (Beach et al., 1982; Bahr, 1995; Sieg et al., 1998).”
From Toxic Concentrations of Glutamate Induce Ferroptosis without Affecting Mitochondrial Respiration in Rodent Brain Slice Cultures (2026) · cites this paper as Bahr, 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wayman, G. A., Impey, S., Marks, D., Saneyoshi, T., Grant, W. F., Derkach, V., & Soderling, T. R. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.008 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Vaglio-Garro, A., Theuermann, M., Sweis, K. E., Zavadskis, S., Kokas, M., Környei, Z., Karas, M., Tretter, L., Komlódi, T., Weidinger, A., et al. (2026) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0439-25.2026
- Authors
- Bahr, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bahr, B. A.
- ORCID
- Bahr, B. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 294-305
- ISSN
- 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4547
- OpenAlex
- W1997410519
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG 00538)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- organotypic slice cultures, hippocampus, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, synaptogenesis, excitotoxicity, ischemia, Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, neuronal atrophy, aging, hippocampal development
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nervous System Diseases, Synapses, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review