The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increasing coping resources at work: A field experiment to increase social support, improve work team functioning, and enhance employee mental health
Abstract
Correlational studies have identified worksite coping resources such as social support and perceived control, and have suggested a positive role for such resources in employee stress processes. However, little experimental evidence has demonstrated the causal role of worksite coping resources in improving mental health, nor how worksite coping resources can be enhanced. This paper reports the results of a field experiment intended to provide such evidence. Human service workers participated in a theory‐driven training program designed to increase individual and group psychosocial coping resources and individuals' abilities to use those resources when coping with job demands. The inclusion of selection variables in models used to estimate the impact of the intervention controlled for selection biases and also allowed for the assessment of the impact of the training on those workers identified as most prone to turnover and on those most likely to participate in such an intervention. Results indicated that the program enhanced the work team climate and reduced depresssive symptoms and somatization in those most at risk for leaving their jobs. The program was also effective in increasing the amount of supervisor support received on the job and strengthening perceptions of coping abilities in those workers most likely to participate in the program.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The sociological study of stress
Pearlin, L. I. (1989) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136956 · Cited by 3,263
Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis.
Folkman, S. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.839 · Cited by 2,784
The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A Step in the Validation of a New Self-Report Scale
Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. F. (1976) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.128.3.280 · Cited by 2,298
Social support as coping assistance.
Thoits, P. A. (1986) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.54.4.416 · Cited by 1,780
Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation Designs
Bloom, H. S. (1984) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x8400800205 · Cited by 532
Effects of Different Sources of Social support and Social Conflict on Emotional Well-Being
Abbey, A., Abramis, D. J., & Caplan, R. D. (1985) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0602_2 · Cited by 452
Cited by
7 Redesigning Work Design Theories: The Rise of Relational and Proactive Perspectives
Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520903047327 · Cited by 1,429
The benefits of interventions for work-related stress
(2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.2.270 · Cited by 999
Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review
Michie, S., & Williams, S. (2003) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.60.1.3 · Cited by 816
Hogan, B. E., Linden, W., & Najarian, B. (2002) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00102-7 · Cited by 788
Ng, T. W. H., & Sorensen, K. L. (2008) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601107313307 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Heaney, C. A., Price, R. H., & Rafferty, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 335-352
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2156311855
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing coping resources at work: A field experiment to increase social support, improve work team functioning, and enhance employee mental health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.4030160405
- The paper
- Heaney, C. A., Price, R. H., & Rafferty, J. (1995). Increasing coping resources at work: A field experiment to increase social support, improve work team functioning, and enhance employee mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.