The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality control of daily meteorological data in China, 1951–2000: a new dataset
Abstract
Long‐term observational data are essential for understanding local and regional climate and climate change. These data are also important for hydrological designs and agricultural decision making. This study examined the daily meteorological data from 726 stations in China from 1951 to 2000, and developed an unprecedented climatic dataset that contains 10 daily variables: maximum and minimum surface air temperatures, mean surface air temperature, skin surface temperature, surface air relative humidity, wind speed, wind gust, sunshine duration hours, precipitation, and pan evaporation. The characteristics of the original stations' data and quality‐control methods designed and used in developing this dataset are detailed. The quality‐control procedures identified less than 0.05% of the data records as being erroneous because of typos and incorrect units, reading, or data coding. When the spatial and temporal consistency of the variables' time series were inspected, nearly 37.9% of the stations were found to have one or more variables with inconsistent changes. The sources causing the temporal inconsistency/discontinuity were evaluated, and a method was developed and applied to adjust those data segments containing inconsistent values. The resulting data series, as an alternative to the original quality‐controlled series, showed both spatially and temporally consistent trends in the occurrence frequency of extreme climate events compared with the unadjusted data series. Finally, the quality‐controlled daily data were gridded to a 1.0° × 1.0° grid system covering China after the erroneous and missing data were estimated. This new dataset opens up opportunities for analysing and understanding the climate variability and climate change in China. Copyright © 2004 Royal Meteorological Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comprehensive Automated Quality Assurance of Daily Surface Observations
Durre, I., Menne, M. J., Gleason, B. E., Houston, T. G., & Vose, R. S. (2010) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/2010jamc2375.1 · Cited by 354
Sui, Y., Jiang, D., & Tian, Z. (2013) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-012-0810-z · Cited by 85
Quality control of daily rainfall data with neural networks
Sciuto, G., Bonaccorso, B., Cancelliere, A., & Rossi, G. (2009) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.10.008 · Cited by 34
Bliefernicht, J., Salack, S., Waongo, M., Annor, T., Laux, P., & Kunstmann, H. (2022) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.7467 · Cited by 35
Automatic quality control of weather data for timely decisions in agriculture
Dandrifosse, S., Jago, A., Huart, J. P., Michaud, V., Planchon, V., & Rosillon, D. (2024) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100445 · Cited by 24
Quality of meteorological data used in the context of agriculture: an issue
de Castro Junior, S. L., da Silva, I. J. O., Alves-Souza, S. N., & de Souza, L. S. (2020) · 2020 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) · doi:10.23919/cisti49556.2020.9141047 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, S., Hu, Q., & Qian, W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Climatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-14
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 853-870
- ISSN
- 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0088
- OpenAlex
- W2160097385
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.