The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of seven meteorological indices for drought monitoring in Iran
Abstract
Drought monitoring is an essential component of drought risk management. It is normally performed using various drought indices that are effectively continuous functions of rainfall and other hydrometeorological variables. A number of drought indices have been introduced and applied in different countries to date. This paper compares the performance of seven indices for drought monitoring in the Tehran province of Iran. The indices used include deciles index (DI), percent of normal (PN), standard precipitation index (SPI), China‐Z index (CZI), modified CZI (MCZI), Z‐Score and effective drought index (EDI). The comparison of indices is based on drought cases and classes that were detected in the province over the 32 years of data, as well as over the latest 1998–2001 drought spell. The results show that SPI, CZI and Z‐Score perform similarly with regard to drought identification and respond slowly to drought onset. DI appears to be very responsive to rainfall events of a particular year, but it has inconsistent spatial and temporal variation. The SPI and EDI were found to be able to detect the onset of drought, its spatial and temporal variation consistently, and it may be recommended for operational drought monitoring in the Province. However, the EDI was found to be more responsive to the emerging drought and performed better. Copyright © 2006 Royal Meteorological Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis?
Madani, K. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-014-0182-z · Cited by 708
The impracticality of a universal drought definition
Lloyd-Hughes, B. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-013-1025-7 · Cited by 382
Drought forecasting using artificial neural networks and time series of drought indices
Morid, S., Smakhtin, V., & Bagherzadeh, K. (2007) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1498 · Cited by 337
Self-citationDeo, R. C., & Şahin, M. (2015) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.10.016 · Cited by 317
Drought indicators revisited: the need for a wider consideration of environment and society
Bachmair, S., Stahl, K., Collins, K., Hannaford, J., Acreman, M., Svoboda, M., Knutson, C., Smith, K. H., Wall, N., Fuchs, B., et al. (2016) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1154 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Morid, S., Smakhtin, V., & Moghaddasi, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Climatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 971-985
- ISSN
- 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0088
- OpenAlex
- W1980530606
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of seven meteorological indices for drought monitoring in Iran. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/joc.1264
- The paper
- Morid, S., Smakhtin, V., & Moghaddasi, M. (2006). Comparison of seven meteorological indices for drought monitoring in Iran. International Journal of Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.