The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus between GCM climate change projections with empirical downscaling: precipitation downscaling over South Africa
Abstract
This paper discusses issues that surround the development of empirical downscaling techniques as context for presenting a new approach based on self‐organizing maps (SOMs). The technique is applied to the downscaling of daily precipitation over South Africa. SOMs are used to characterize the state of the atmosphere on a localized domain surrounding each target location on the basis of NCEP 6‐hourly reanalysis data from 1979 to 2002, and using surface and 700‐hPa u and v wind vectors, specific and relative humidities, and surface temperature. Each unique atmospheric state is associated with an observed precipitation probability density function (PDF). Future climate states are derived from three global climate models (GCMs): HadAM3, ECHAM4.5, CSIRO Mk2. In each case, the GCM data are mapped to the NCEP SOMs for each target location and a precipitation value is drawn at random from the associated precipitation PDF. The downscaling approach combines the advantages of a direct transfer function and a stochastic weather generator, and provides an indication of the strength of the regional versus stochastic forcing, as well as a measure of stationarity in the atmosphere–precipitation relationship. The methodology is applied to South Africa. The downscaling reveals a similarity in the projected climate change between the models. Each GCM projects similar changes in atmospheric state and they converge on a downscaled solution that points to increased summer rainfall in the interior and the eastern part of the country, and a decrease in winter rainfall in the Western Cape. The actual GCM precipitation projections from the three models show large areas of intermodel disagreement, suggesting that the model differences may be due to their precipitation parameterization schemes, rather than to basic disagreements in their projections of the changing atmospheric state over South Africa. Copyright © 2006 Royal Meteorological Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kohonen, T. (2001) · Springer Series in Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2 · Cited by 16,019
Self-Organization and Associative Memory
Kohonen, T. (1989) · Springer Series in Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-88163-3 · Cited by 8,740
Kohonen, T. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58325 · Cited by 8,414
Kattsov, Zhao, Z., Joussaume, S., Covey, C., McAvaney, B. J., Ogana, W., & Kitoh, A. (2001) · Cited by 2,349
Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: A comparison of methods
Wilby, R. L., Wigley, T. M. L., Conway, D., Jones, P. D., Hewitson, B. C., Main, J., & Wilks, D. S. (1998) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/98wr02577 · Cited by 868
Self-citationGuidelines For Use Of Climate Scenarios Developed From Statistical Downscaling Methods.
Wilby, R. L., Charles, S. P., Zorita, E., Timbal, B., Whetton, P. H., & Mearns, L. O. (2004) · Figshare · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1438319 · Cited by 795
Climate downscaling: techniques and application
Hewitson, B. C., & Crane, R. (1996) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr007085 · Cited by 694
Self-citationAn overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
Covey, C., AchutaRao, K. M., Cubasch, U., Jones, P., Lambert, S. J., Mann, M. E., Phillips, T. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2003) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/s0921-8181(02)00193-5 · Cited by 373
CMIP1 evaluation and intercomparison of coupled climate models
Lambert, S. J., & Boer, G. J. (2001) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/pl00013736 · Cited by 354
Cavazos, T. (2000) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1718:usomti>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 237
Cited by
Influence of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Planetary Wave Resonance and Extreme Weather Events
Mann, M. E., Rahmstorf, S., Kornhuber, K., Steinman, B. A., Miller, S. K., & Coumou, D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep45242 · Cited by 379
Stringer, L. C., Dyer, J. C., Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., Twyman, C., & Mkwambisi, D. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.002 · Cited by 351
Interpreting climate data visualisations to inform adaptation decisions
Daron, J. D., Lorenz, S., Wolski, P., Blamey, R. C., & Jack, C. (2015) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2015.06.007 · Cited by 50
Weyer, N. M. (2018) · Unpublished · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.11625.40809 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Hewitson, B. C., & Crane, R. G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Climatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-21
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1315-1337
- ISSN
- 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0088
- OpenAlex
- W2123058372
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus between GCM climate change projections with empirical downscaling: precipitation downscaling over South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/joc.1314
- The paper
- Hewitson, B. C., & Crane, R. G. (2006). Consensus between GCM climate change projections with empirical downscaling: precipitation downscaling over South Africa. International Journal of Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.