Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High‐flow and flood trends in a network of undisturbed catchments in the UK

Hannaford, Jamie, Marsh, Terry J.·2008·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

This study presents the results of trend tests applied to high‐flow and flood records from a network of catchments in the UK. These rivers have flow regimes which are relatively undisturbed by anthropogenic influences, enabling a characterization of natural, climate‐driven trends. Trend tests were applied to indicators of flood magnitude and frequency, and also indicators of high‐flow magnitude (10‐ and 30‐day maxima) and duration (prevalence of high‐flows). Significant positive trends over the 30–40 years leading up to 2003 were identified in all indicators, and these were primarily found in upland, maritime‐influenced catchments in northern and western areas of the UK. The results suggest a trend towards more protracted high‐flows and more spate conditions in northern and western areas, but trends in flood magnitude were less prevalent. Few compelling trends were found in the English lowlands, where significant high‐flow trends were influenced by a sequence of notable flood events through the exceptionally wet winter of 2000/1. The observed trends have parallels with some projections for extreme rainfall changes under climate change scenarios. However, high‐flow indicators for many northern and western catchments were correlated with the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), so recent increases are probably caused by a shift towards a more prevalent positive NAO since the 1960s. Six longer (>55 years) hydrometric records were used to place recent trends in a historical context; there was little evidence for trend in the longer time series, but fluctuations in the records suggest that recent trends may be influenced by multi‐decadal variability, which has important consequences for trend detection as the majority of UK gauging station records begin in a relatively quiescent period for high‐flows. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.1643

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Hannaford, J., & Marsh, T. J.
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-22
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1325-1338
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W2084217276
Cited by
179
References
1
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐flow and flood trends in a network of undisturbed catchments in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/joc.1643
The paper
Hannaford, J., & Marsh, T. J. (2008). High‐flow and flood trends in a network of undisturbed catchments in the UK. International Journal of Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1643

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.