The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in extreme precipitation indices derived from a daily rainfall database for the South of Portugal
Abstract
The rainfall regime of the South of Portugal is Mediterranean with Atlantic influence. Long‐term series of reliable precipitation records are essential for land and water resources management, climate‐change monitoring, modelling of erosion and run‐off, among other applications for ecosystem and hydrological impact modelling. This study provides a qualitative classification of 106 daily rainfall series from stations located in the South of Portugal and evaluates temporal patterns in extreme precipitation by calculating a number of indicators at stations with homogeneous data within the 1955/1999 period. The methodology includes both absolute and relative approaches and a new homogeneity testing procedure, besides the application of other statistical tests. The proposed technique is an extension of the Ellipse test that takes into account the contemporaneous relationship between several candidate series from the same climatic area (SUR + Ellipse test). The results indicate that this technique is a valuable tool for the detection of non‐climatic irregularities in climate time series if the station network is dense enough. The existence of trends and other temporal patterns in extreme precipitation indices was investigated and uncertainty about rainfall patterns evolution was assessed. Three indices describing wet events and another three indicators characterizing dry conditions were analysed through regression models and smoothing techniques. The simple aridity intensity index (AII) reflects increases in the magnitude of dryness. Especially pronounced trends are found over most of southern Portugal in the 1955/1999 period, highlighting the fact that large areas are threatened by drought and desertification. The trend signals of the wetness indices are not significant at the majority of stations, but there is evidence of increasing short‐term precipitation intensity over the region during the last three decades of the twentieth century. Finally, the results also indicate that extreme precipitation variability and climate uncertainty are greater in recent times. Copyright © 2008 Royal Meteorological Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
A Review and Comparison of Changepoint Detection Techniques for Climate Data
Reeves, J., Chen, J., Wang, X. L., Lund, R., & Lu, Q. Q. (2007) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/jam2493.1 · Cited by 638 · cited 8×
“For example, Rodrigo and Trigo (2007) showed that the 95th percentile and the percentage of rain falling on days with rainfall above the 95th percentile have negative trends at Relı́quias in all seasons and for yearly values, but Serpa has increasing trends for yearly values.”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Costa, A. C., & Soares, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Climatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-17
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1956-1975
- ISSN
- 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0088
- OpenAlex
- W2086353357
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in extreme precipitation indices derived from a daily rainfall database for the South of Portugal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/joc.1834
- The paper
- Costa, A. C., & Soares, A. (2009). Trends in extreme precipitation indices derived from a daily rainfall database for the South of Portugal. International Journal of Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.