The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving estimation of missing values in daily precipitation series by a probability density function‐preserving approach
Abstract
This work presents a novel method for estimating missing values in daily precipitation series. It is aimed at identifying the event time location with good accuracy and reconstructing the correct amount of daily rainfall. In addition, the statistical properties of the time series, i.e. both probability distribution and long‐term statistics, are preserved. The completion method is based on a two‐step algorithm that uses information from a cluster of neighboring stations. First, wet and dry days are tagged, and subsequently, the full precipitation amount for wet‐classified days is estimated by a modified multi‐linear regression approach. This method avoids overestimation of the number of wet days and underestimation of intense precipitation events, which are typical side effects of common regression‐based approaches. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-contained infilling only performs well for variables with high temporal autocorrelation such as temperature and is problematic for daily precipitation and in covering lengthy data gaps.
“Self-contained infilling, however, only performs well for variables with high temporal autocorrelation such as temperature and is problematic for daily precipitation (Simolo et al., 2010; Teegavarapu and Chandramouli, 2005) and in covering lengthy data gaps.”
From SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018 (2020) · cites this paper as Simolo et al., 2010
Quantile mapping performs well in estimating missing station data.
“Quantile mapping (QM) is widely used to correct biases in meteorological data (Maraun, 2013; Cannon et al., 2015), and it performs well in estimating missing station data (Simolo et al., 2010; Newman et al., 2015, 2019; Devi et al., 2019).”
From SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018 (2020) · cites this paper as Simolo et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.5194/hess-10-197-2006 · DOI
- 10.1029/2005JD006290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02358-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1989.tb05410.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03076-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-006-0184-y · DOI
- 10.1126/science.237.4811.171 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0607:ROPPEF>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/joc.660 · DOI
- 10.1002/joc.613 · DOI
- 10.1029/2003JD004296 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.04.020 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1959)087<0367:AOOAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/WR018i002p00413 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0140:ASTMFM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0450-34.2.371 · DOI
- 10.1002/joc.1063 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2787:TQCOLT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1580:CASCND>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1080/02626660009492388 · DOI
- 10.1080/02626660009492389 · DOI
- 10.1029/2006WR005788 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005432803188 · DOI
- 10.1057/jors.1996.21 · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-7061(94)90027-2 · DOI
- 10.1175/3238.1 · DOI
- 10.1038/377217a0 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0231:STOPAF>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1587:EMDMAM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00332-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.026 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005495627778 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1952)080<0129:IOMPR>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/joc.1657 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0853:AOICDE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- ShepardD.1968.A two‐dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data.Proceeding of the Twenty‐Third National Conference of the Association for Computing Machinery: Washington DC;517–524. · DOI
- Shepard D, 1984, Computer Mapping: The SYMAP Interpolation Algorithm, in Spatial Statistics and Models, 133145
- 10.2307/2981736 · DOI
- Suhaila J, 2008, Revised spatial weighting methods for estimation of missing rainfall data, Asia‐Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 44, 93
- 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1985.tb00147.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-8095(95)00067-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00210-0 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<2561:ATWMFI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/91WR00977 · DOI
- Wilks DS, 1995, Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, 464
- 10.1559/152304085783914686 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., Newman, A. J., Wood, A. W., Papalexiou, S. M., Vionnet, V., & Whitfield, P. H. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-2381-2020 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Simolo, C., Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., & Nanni, T.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (IT)
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Brunetti, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Climatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-21
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1564-1576
- ISSN
- 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0088
- OpenAlex
- W2025560597
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Climatology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centro Euro - Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
- Keywords
- missing data estimation, daily precipitation, multi-linear regression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review