Cited by 169Climate variability and modelsUrban Heat Island MitigationCalibration and Measurement Techniques

Effects of changing exposure of thermometers at land stations

Parker, D. E.·1994·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

In view of the implications for the assessment of climatic changes since the mid‐nineteenth century, systematic changes of exposure of thermometers at land stations are reviewed. Particular emphasis is laid on changes of exposure during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century when shelters often differed considerably from the Stevenson screens, and variants thereof, which have been prevalent during the past few decades. It is concluded that little overall bias in land surface air temperature has accumulated since the late nineteenth century: however, the earliest extratropical data may have been biased typically 0.2°C warm in summer and by day, and similarly cold in winter and by night, relative to modern observations. Furthermore, there is likely to have been a warm bias in the tropics in the early twentieth century: this bias, implied by comparisons between Stevenson screens and the tropical sheds then in use, is confirmed by comparisons between coastal land surface air temperatures and nearby marine surface temperatures, and was probably of the order of 0.2°C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.3370140102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The exposure characteristics of nineteenth century pre-Stevenson screen installations had a positive bias relative to instruments installed in Stevenson screens.

    “The exposure characteristics of the nineteenth century pre-Stevenson screen installations have been shown to have had a positive bias relative to instruments installed in the Stevenson screens, which provide more consistent protection from direct solar radiation (Chenoweth 1993; Parker 1994).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 169

Authors
Parker, D. E.
Affiliations
Met Office (GB)
Corresponding author
Parker, D. E.
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1-31
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W2120531223
Cited by
169
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Climatology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
Keywords
Stevenson screen, land surface air temperature, measurement bias, historical climate records, climate change assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review