Cited by 150Remote Sensing in AgricultureClimate change impacts on agricultureSugarcane Cultivation and Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of NASA/POWER satellite‐based weather system for Brazilian conditions and its impact on sugarcane yield simulation

Monteiro, Leonardo A., Sentelhas, Paulo C., Pedra, George U.·2018·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

The gridded database provided by National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Prediction of World Wide Energy Resources (NASA/POWER) presents a global coverage of complete weather data at horizontal resolution of 1° latitude–longitude, becoming a potential source for agrometeorological studies. Once Brazil is a country with continental dimensions and the major sugarcane world producer, and its density of ground weather stations suitable for an efficient agricultural planning is sparse, the objectives of this study were to test how robust is the NASA/POWER database through its comparison with the Brazilian ground weather stations network records (INMET) and to quantify the impacts on potential ( Y p ) and attainable ( Y att ) sugarcane yield simulations when setting NASA/POWER as source of input weather data. The comparisons for weather data records and sugarcane yield simulations were carried out from 1997 to 2016. Statistical indices presented a satisfactory performance for average air temperature ( R 2 = 0.73; d = 0.91), minimum air temperature ( R 2 = 0.72; d = 0.91), maximum air temperature ( R 2 = 0.57; d = 0.84), solar radiation (SR) ( R 2 = 0.71; d = 0.92), sunshine hours ( R 2 = 0.68; d = 0.90) and reference evapotranspiration, when calculated through Priestley–Taylor (ETo‐PT) method ( R 2 = 0.76; d = 0.93). When the weather variables were aggregated and compared with a 10‐day time scale, a strong improvement of statistical indices was obtained. Y p presented root me…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.5282

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 · DOI
  2. Azevedo PV, 2015, Characterization of human comfort in urban areas of Brazilian semiarid, Rev. Bras. Meteorol., 30, 371, 10.1590/0102-778620140149 · DOI
  3. Bai J, 2010, Evaluation of NASA satellite‐and model‐derived weather data for simulation of maize yield potential in China, Agron. J., 102, 9, 10.2134/agronj2009.0085 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.005 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.054 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.01.002 · DOI
  7. 10.1155/2015/325718 · DOI
  8. 10.2136/sssaj2004.0140 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2009.01559.x · DOI
  10. DiasHB.2016.Intercomparação de modelos de simulação da cana‐de‐açúcar e seu uso na avaliação da quebra de produtividade e dos impactos da irrigação em diferentes regiões do Brasil. Master's thesis College of Agriculture ‘Luiz de Queiroz’ University of São Paulo Piracicaba Brazil 167 p.
  11. 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00091-9 · DOI
  12. Garcia AG, 2005, Evaluation of an improved daily solar radiation generator for the southeastern USA, Clim. Res., 29, 91, 10.3354/cr029091 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0168-1923(86)90014-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1590/S0103-90162009000500003 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.004 · DOI
  16. 10.1029/2008JD010201 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0105992 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/joc.1417 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/joc.4610 · DOI
  20. Laclau PB, 2009, Growth of the whole root system for a plant crop of sugarcane under rainfed and irrigated environments in Brazil, Field Crops Res., 114, 351, 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.004 · DOI
  21. Liu DL, 2001, Simulation of biomass and sugar accumulation in sugarcane using a process‐based model, Ecol. Modell., 144, 181
  22. 10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s00704-016-1840-8 · DOI
  24. Monteiro JEB, 2009, Agrometeorologia dos cultivos: o fator meteorológico na produção agrícola
  25. 10.1007/s12355-013-0275-0 · DOI
  26. Monteiro LA, 2017, Sugarcane yield gap: can it be determined at national level with a simple agrometeorological model?, Crop Past Sci., 68, 272, 10.1071/CP16334 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.eja.2016.10.013 · DOI
  28. Pereira AR, 2002, Agrometeorologia: Fundamentos e Aplicações Práticas
  29. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.03.015 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/ncomms6989 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Richardson CW, 1984, WGEN: A Model for Generating Daily Weather Variables, 83
  32. 10.1175/2011JCLI3983.1 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Rolim GS, 2015, Influence of El Niño and La Niña on sugarcane yield and sucrose production in northern São Paulo, Brazil, Aust. J. Crop Sci., 9, 509
  34. 10.1590/S0103-65132013005000081 · DOI
  35. 10.3354/cr010095 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/joc.1951 · DOI
  37. Soltani A, 2003, A statistical comparison of the stochastic weather generators WGEN and SIMMETEO, Clim. Res., 24, 215, 10.3354/cr024215 · DOI
  38. 10.1590/S0006-87052011000300028 · DOI
  39. Thornthwaite CW, 1955, The Water Balance of the Earth, 104
  40. Thornton PE, 2014, Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1‐km Grido for North America, Version 2
  41. 10.1111/gcb.12302 · DOI
  42. Wart J, 2015, Creating long‐term weather data from thin air for crop simulation modeling, Agric. For. Meteorol., 209, 49, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.020 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.006 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.05.017 · DOI
  45. White JW, 2011, Evaluation of satellite‐based, modeled‐derived daily solar radiation data for the continental United States, Agron. J., 103, 1242, 10.2134/agronj2011.0038 · DOI
  46. 10.1029/JC090iC05p08995 · DOI
  47. Wit CT, 1965, Photosynthesis of leaf canopies, Agric. Res. Rep., 663, 57
  48. 10.1175/2008JHM899.1 · DOI
  49. Wrege MS, 2005, Potential regions for sugarcane cultivation in the state of Paraná, Brazil based on frost risk analysis, Rev. Bras. Agrometeorol., 13, 113
  50. 10.1002/joc.4518 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/wcc.294 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Monteiro, L. A., Sentelhas, P. C., & Pedra, G. U.
Affiliations
  • World Meteorological Organization (CH)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Sentelhas, Paulo C.
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-07
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
1571-1581
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W2752126604
Cited by
150
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Climatology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Keywords
NASA POWER, satellite weather data, agrometeorology, air temperature, solar radiation, sunshine duration, reference evapotranspiration, Priestley-Taylor method, Brazil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review