Cited by 130Climate variability and modelsHydrology and Drought AnalysisClimate change impacts on agriculture

Attributing drivers of the 2016 Kenyan drought

Open access
Uhe, Peter, Philip, Sjoukje, Kew, Sarah, Shah, Kasturi, Kimutai, Joyce, Mwangi, Emmah, van Oldenborgh, Geert Jan, Singh, Roop +4 more·2018·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

In 2016 and continuing into 2017, Kenya experienced drought conditions, with over 3 million people in need of food aid due to low rainfall during 2016. Whenever extreme events like this happen, questions are raised about the role of climate change and how natural variability such as the El Niño ‐ Southern Oscillation influenced the likelihood and intensity of the event. Here we aim to quantify the relative contributions of different climate drivers to this drought by applying three independent methodologies of extreme event attribution. Analysing precipitation data for the South East and North West of Kenya we found no consistent signal from human‐induced climate change and thus conclude that it has not greatly affected the likelihood of low rainfall such as in 2016. However, 2016 was a La Niña year and we show that this event was indeed more likely because of the specific sea surface temperatures. There is a trend in temperatures in the region due to climate change that may have exacerbated the effects of this drought. By analysing precipitation minus evaporation and soil moisture, simulated by one climate model only, we did not see a reduction in moisture in simulations in the current climate compared with simulations without climate change. However, there are expected effects of higher temperatures that our simulations do not cover, such as increased demand on water resources and stress on livestock. Although we find no significant influence of climate change on precipitation, we cannot rule out that temperature‐related impacts of drought are linked to human‐induced climate change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.5389

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhe, P., Philip, S., Kew, S., Shah, K., Kimutai, J., Mwangi, E., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Singh, R., Arrighi, J., Jjemba, E., Cullen, H., & Otto, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL)
  • Climate Central (US)
  • Kenya Meteorological Department Nairobi Kenya
  • Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) De Bilt The Netherlands
  • Climate Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Uhe, Peter
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-22
Volume
38
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W2775985750
Cited by
130
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Climatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
European Union (607085)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
drought attribution, climate change, ENSO, La Niña, sea surface temperature, rainfall variability, soil moisture, heavy rainfall, food security, climate extremes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review