Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implications of employing detailed urban canopy parameters for mesoscale climate modelling: a comparison between WUDAPT and GIS databases over Vienna, Austria

Open access
Hammerberg, Kris, Brousse, Oscar, Martilli, Alberto, Mahdavi, Ardeshir·2018·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

One of the major obstacles to using numerical weather prediction models for guidance on mitigating urbanization's impact on local and regional climate is the lack of detailed and model ready morphological data at urban scale. The World Urban Database and Access Portal Tool (WUDAPT) is a recent project developed to extract climate relevant information on urban areas, in the form of local climate zones (LCZs), out of remote sensing imagery. This description of the urban landscape has been tested and used for parameterization of different urban canopy models (UCM) for mesoscale studies. As detailed information is usually bounded within cities' centres, crowdsourced and remote sensing data offer the possibility to move beyond the old barriers of urban climate investigations by studying the full range of variation from the urban core to the periphery and its related impacts on local climate. Thus, for this study we sought to compare the relative impact of using the WUDAPT methodology versus a simplified definition of the urban morphology extracted out of detailed GIS information to initialize a regional weather model and compare the output against official and crowdsourced weather station networks. A case study over Vienna, Austria was conducted using the weather research forecasting (WRF) model, coupled with the building effect parameterization and building energy models (BEP–BEM) in five distinct seasonal periods. Results demonstrated that using detailed GIS data to derive morphological descriptions of LCZs for mesoscale studies provided only a marginal overall improvement over using the default WUDAPT parameters based on the ranges proposed by Stewart and Oke (2012). The findings also highlighted the importance of developing techniques that are better at capturing the morphological heterogeneity across the entire urban landscape and thus improve our understandings of UCM performance over urban areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.5447

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Hammerberg, K., Brousse, O., Martilli, A., & Mahdavi, A.
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-09
Volume
38
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W2792011679
Cited by
160
References
2
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications of employing detailed urban canopy parameters for mesoscale climate modelling: a comparison between WUDAPT and GIS databases over Vienna, Austria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/joc.5447
The paper
Hammerberg, K., Brousse, O., Martilli, A., & Mahdavi, A. (2018). Implications of employing detailed urban canopy parameters for mesoscale climate modelling: a comparison between WUDAPT and GIS databases over Vienna, Austria. International Journal of Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5447

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.