Cited by 41Technology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Consumer adoption of on‐demand digital platforms: An integrated model

Open access
Lim, Tze‐Yin, Lim, Bibiana Chiu‐Yiong, Leong, Choi‐Meng, Phang, Ing Grace, Foong, Weng Heng·2023·Global Business and Organizational Excellence

Abstract

On‐demand digital platforms are omnipresent in the contemporary marketplace of the digital era. The purpose of this study was to assess the factors influencing consumers’ intention to adopt on‐demand digital platforms in the context of a developing country. Based on a modified integration of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and the social influence theory, this study contended that electronic word‐of‐mouth (eWOM) about on‐demand digital platforms shapes consumers' perceived risk and subjective norms, which, along with the other elements of UTAUT, influence their intention to use on‐demand digital platforms. A self‐administered questionnaire was developed and distributed online, yielding a total of 226 responses, which were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modelling. The findings revealed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, subjective norms, and perceived risk significantly affect consumers’ intention, wherein eWOM reduces perceived risk and shapes subjective norms to adopt on‐demand digital platforms. Therefore, this study contributes to the literature on consumer adoption of new‐age digital products, and in this case, on‐demand digital platforms, with implications for theory and practice in this space.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joe.22210

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 41

Authors
Lim, T., Lim, B. C., Leong, C., Phang, I. G., & Foong, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Business, Design and Arts Swinburne University of Technology Kuching Malaysia
  • UCSI University (MY)
  • Faculty of Business, Economics and Accounting Universiti Malaysia Sabah Kota Kinabalu Malaysia
Corresponding author
Lim, Bibiana Chiu‐Yiong
Venue
Global Business and Organizational Excellence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-09
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
75-88
ISSN
  • 1932-2054 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2062
OpenAlex
W4323660529
Cited by
41
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Business and Organizational Excellence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UMS Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sabah) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
consumer technology adoption, UTAUT, social influence theory, electronic word of mouth, risk perception, subjective norms, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, intention to use, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review