The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling supply chain adaptation for disruptions: An empirically grounded complex adaptive systems approach
Abstract
Through the development and usage of an agent‐based model, this article investigates firms' adaptive strategies against disruptions in a supply chain network. Viewing supply chain networks as complex adaptive systems, we first construct and analyze a real‐world supply chain network among 2,971 firms spanning 90 industry sectors. We then develop an agent‐based simulation to show how the model of firms' adaptive behaviors can leverage competition relationships within a supply chain network. The simulation also models how disruptions propagate in the supply chain network through cascading failures. With the simulation, we seek to understand if a firm's adaptive behaviors can reduce the impact of disruptions in supply chain networks. Therefore, we propose, evaluate, and analyze two types of adaptive strategies a firm can leverage to reduce the negative effects of supply chain network disruptions. First, we deploy in our model a reactive strategy, which restructures the network in response to a disruption event among first‐tier suppliers. Next, we develop and propose proactive strategies, which are used when a distant disruption is observed but has not yet hit the focal firm. We discuss the implications related to how and when firms can improve their resilience against supply disruptions by leveraging adaptive strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/070710111 · Cited by 8,019
A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911963 · Cited by 5,647
The Importance of the Normality Assumption in Large Public Health Data Sets
Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., & Chen, L. (2002) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546 · Cited by 1,803
The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration
Axelrod, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9781400822300 · Cited by 1,759
van der Vegt, G. S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M., & George, G. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.4004 · Cited by 742
Cited by
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727 · Cited by 2,100
Reconfigurable supply chain: the X-network
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1774679 · Cited by 501
Ivanov, D., Tang, C. S., Dolgui, A., Battini, D., & Das, A. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1798035 · Cited by 452
Supply chain resilience: new challenges and opportunities
Shi, X., Liu, W., & Lim, M. K. (2024) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2023.2262396 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, K., Zuo, Z., & Blackhurst, J. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-212
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2924399050
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 46.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.