The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tendons and ligaments: A morphological and biochemical comparison
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare selected rabbit tendons and ligaments morphologically and biochemically. Five representative structures from each of six age‐ and sex‐matched rabbits were compared. Biochemical analyses included total collagen, reducible collagen cross‐links, quantitative collagen typing, DNA, and glycosaminoglycans. Histological and chemical differences were demonstrated between the tendons and the ligaments. Smaller differences were also found between the individual ligaments (collateral and cruciate) and between the two tendons (patellar and Achilles) that were examined. These findings suggest that ligaments are more metabolically active than tendons, having more plump cellular nuclei, higher DNA content, larger amounts of reducible cross‐links, and the presence of more type III collagen, as compared with tendons. They also contain slightly less total collagen than tendons and more glycosaminoglycans. We conclude that the tendons and ligaments studied have unique histological and biochemical characteristics, despite their gross similarities. Relatively increased metabolic activity in ligaments, implied by our findings, may be species specific, age related (transient), or may truly represent a structural expression of functional need for more rapid adaptation. Further investigation of other similarities or differences between particular ligaments (or tendons) is indicated, and attention is directed toward the importance of such variables in development of models for tendon and ligament studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament
Duthon, V. B., Barea, C., Abrassart, S., Fasel, J. H., Fritschy, D., & Ménétrey, J. (2006) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-005-0679-9 · Cited by 543
Tissue Engineering of Ligaments
Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Altman, G., Horan, R., & Kaplan, D. L. (2004) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140037 · Cited by 346
Murray, M. M., Spindler, K. P., Ballard, P., Welch, T. P., Zurakowski, D., & Nanney, L. B. (2007) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.20367 · Cited by 300
Chen, X., Jones, I. A., Park, C., & Vangsness, C. T. (2018) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546517743746 · Cited by 294
UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system
Chang, E. Y., Du, J., & Chung, C. B. (2015) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.24713 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Amiel, D., Frank, C., Harwood, F., Fronek, J., & Akeson, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-265
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2054917698
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tendons and ligaments: A morphological and biochemical comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.1100010305
- The paper
- Amiel, D., Frank, C., Harwood, F., Fronek, J., & Akeson, W. (1983). Tendons and ligaments: A morphological and biochemical comparison. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100010305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.