Cited by 230Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyTendon Structure and Treatment

Use of patellar tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the rabbit: A long‐term histologic and biomechanical study

Ballock, R. Tracy, Woo, Savio L‐Y., Lyon, Roger M., Hollis, J. Marcus, Akeson, Wayne H.·1989·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

To assess the degree of success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) replacement using the patellar tendon (PT) autograft, 29 New Zealand white rabbits underwent ACL reconstruction using a medial one‐third PT autograft. The femur–ligament–tibia complexes were evaluated at 0, 6, 30, and 52 weeks postoperatively for gross and histologic appearances and tensile load to failure properties. Grossly, the autografts did not resemble the control ACLs. Histologically, the autografts progressed from being hypercellular with a random collagen fiber bundle organization to having a near normal cellularity with a more parallel collagen fiber bundle pattern. Anteroposterior knee laxity was more than two times that of the control knees 52 weeks after reconstruction. Biomechanically, the PT autografts plateaued at 30 weeks postoperatively. The ultimate load and stiffness were 15 ± 5% and 24 ± 6% of the control ACLs, respectively. At 52 weeks, the appearance of the PT autograft had some general histologic similarities as compared with the native ACL. However, these similarities did not extend to the functional properties of the autograft.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.1100070404

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 230

Authors
Ballock, R. T., Woo, S. L., Lyon, R. M., Hollis, J. M., & Akeson, W. H.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Woo, Savio L‐Y.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-07
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
474-485
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2014184263
Cited by
230
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AMO7484)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR 34264)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, patellar tendon autograft, rabbit model, graft histology, collagen fiber organization, knee laxity, graft stiffness, graft biomechanics, graft maturation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Femur, Knee Joint, Ligaments, Articular, Medical Illustration, Orthopedic Equipment, Patella, Rabbits, Tendons, Tibia, Transplantation, Autologous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review