Use of patellar tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the rabbit: A long‐term histologic and biomechanical study
Abstract
To assess the degree of success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) replacement using the patellar tendon (PT) autograft, 29 New Zealand white rabbits underwent ACL reconstruction using a medial one‐third PT autograft. The femur–ligament–tibia complexes were evaluated at 0, 6, 30, and 52 weeks postoperatively for gross and histologic appearances and tensile load to failure properties. Grossly, the autografts did not resemble the control ACLs. Histologically, the autografts progressed from being hypercellular with a random collagen fiber bundle organization to having a near normal cellularity with a more parallel collagen fiber bundle pattern. Anteroposterior knee laxity was more than two times that of the control knees 52 weeks after reconstruction. Biomechanically, the PT autografts plateaued at 30 weeks postoperatively. The ultimate load and stiffness were 15 ± 5% and 24 ± 6% of the control ACLs, respectively. At 52 weeks, the appearance of the PT autograft had some general histologic similarities as compared with the native ACL. However, these similarities did not extend to the functional properties of the autograft.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This is consistent with previous animal studies that reported excessive graft necrosis in the early phase, followed by an influx of fibroblasts.
“This is consistent with previous animal studies that reported excessive graft necrosis in the early phase, followed by an influx of fibroblasts [53, 67, 68].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 230
- Authors
- Ballock, R. T., Woo, S. L., Lyon, R. M., Hollis, J. M., & Akeson, W. H.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Woo, Savio L‐Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 474-485
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2014184263
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AMO7484)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR 34264)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Keywords
- anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, patellar tendon autograft, rabbit model, graft histology, collagen fiber organization, knee laxity, graft stiffness, graft biomechanics, graft maturation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Femur, Knee Joint, Ligaments, Articular, Medical Illustration, Orthopedic Equipment, Patella, Rabbits, Tendons, Tibia, Transplantation, Autologous
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review